of /var/tmp/tmp.5.BObueE failed, exit code 2
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3
(Reading database ... 204201 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3 ...
David Fang
http
database ... 204201 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-3 ...
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com
Jack,
If you read the *previous* comment, which JF made, you will see that
he was talking about taking over as the fink committer who was
helping to evaluate your package. Taking over from Peter O'Gorman,
in fact, not from you.
-- Dave
On May 2, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On May 1, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/1/10 7:07 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
libnessus3-ssl is marked as Restrictive (links to OpenSSL) and the
source is now unavailable upstream (license change for newer versions
and
On 31 Mar, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
It's also linking to both /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib and
/sw/lib/libiconv.2.dylib, which is likely to cause problems. There's
probably a way to reorder the linker flags in some Makefile to have it
link only to Fink's libiconv.
freeciv.info
Description: Binary data
I've left in the '-dead_strip_dylibs' stuff as i never received an
answer to my previous query dated April 1st 1:47:45 PM PDT. I hope i've
encapsulated all the concerns as comments in the info file itself. I also
expanded the DescUsage field
The wiki mentions here:
http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:NewMaintainer#Create_your_first_package
that syntax coloring is available for info files. However, the link given
there is dead [404 error]. In fact, the '~chris01' user that hosted it seems
to no longer exist. A
/fangism/finkinfo/
firefox3-10.4.{info,patch}
fangism
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively
On 1 Apr, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
[re-added fink-devel, please try to keep the list in CC]
D'oh! Sorry!!
Well, if you want to convince yourself that all the linked libraries are
actually needed, you can try it once with LDFLAGS=-Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs
and check to
On 1 Apr, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I believe putting
SetLDFLAGS: -Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs
in the .info file should do it.
Thanks, Alexander. Based on this experiment, i've added
bzip2-[shlibs/dev] and libgettext8-[shlibs/dev] to the requirements and
instructed
On Mar 27, 2010, at 06:32 , Max Horn wrote:
I am also very much interested in some 10.4 testers, if there are
any around!
It built fine here.
PowerMac G5 1.6 GHz [2 GB mem] Os X.4.11, Apple X11, XCode 2.5, Fink
0.29.10
Bother, said Pooh, as the pin fell out of the grenade.
On 31 Mar, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
You're not declaring several dependencies (libgettext8-shlibs,
cairo-shlibs, libiconv, among others). Also, there's a dependency on
libgl, but I don't see any linkage to it.
It's also linking to both /usr/lib/libiconv.2.dylib and
On 31 Mar, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Amplifying a bit:
Depends can be implicit--though if they're libraries it's normally
better to spell them out.
BuildDepends can *never* be implicit, because we don't currently have a
mechanism to allow for their inheritance.
Before i put this in the tracker, i'd welcome any and all comments.
freeciv.info
Description: Binary data
There is a known [to me] problem in that the resultant binary is not
using the built in sounds. I am awaiting a reply from upstream but maybe in
the meanwhile you guys
Okeh, i'm somewhat embarrassed in that i've run into a problem with my
own package. Here's the story: i successfully built and ran the new package
last week, and made several minor updates to the description fields. Today i
tentatively removed the sdl-mixer dependency and bumped the
On 4 Mar, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
David, I think the relevant part is that your InstallScript is now
pointing to a non-existant directory.
InstallScript:
/usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=%d
/bin/cp -Rv ../data/* %i/share/%n/
This makes it look in /sw/src
From my own stumbling through the packaging tutorial, i've a few things
to suggest for addition that i wished i'd known while doing this. Had this
been a wiki, i would have already put them in...
* At the end of section 1.2 or the beginning of section 1.3, insert a command
to fink
-dev___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
--
David Reiser
dbrei...@earthlink.net
Greetings,
FreeCiv 2.2.0 did build successfully on my system. This is still a
work in progress [DescUsage at least is outdated, and i think the dependencies
should be freshened], so i won't burden the list with my info file yet.
However, i will be glad to share it with anybody who
On 25 Feb, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On 2/25/10 2:38 PM, David Lowe wrote:
Greetings,
FreeCiv 2.2.0 did build successfully on my system. This is still a
work in progress [DescUsage at least is outdated, and i think the
dependencies should be freshened], so i won't
On 20 Feb, 2010, at 12:50 PM, David Lowe wrote:
Sourceforge is giving a 404 error when looking for
freeciv-2.2.0-rc1.tar.bz2, it has freeciv-2.2.0-RC1.tar.bz2.
D'oh! I was smacking my head over why i kept getting this error even
after 2.2.0 became an official release. This failure
On 17 Feb, 2010, at 7:09 PM, David Lowe wrote:
The version number i have used is 2.2.0-RC1, which is faithful to the
upstream version. Obviously i need to be less faithful, but what is the
suggested way to handle this? Would 2.2.0-rc1 cause any problems?
I seem to run into a bit
On 17 Feb, 2010, at 8:10 PM, Charles Lepple wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:09 PM, David Lowe doctorjl...@verizon.net wrote:
The version number i have used is 2.2.0-RC1, which is faithful to
the upstream version. Obviously i need to be less faithful, but what is the
suggested way
On 18 Feb, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Or rather, 2.2.0 2.2.0-rc1
Oh, i guess i was being a bit myopic there. Thanks for pointing out my
error. In any case, i wasn't planning on releasing my info file until FreeCiv
had a final version. I should just be able to force
I'm experimentally trying to produce a new info file for latest version
of FreeCiv, as a way of working myself through the packaging tutorial. The
package validates successfully, but then i get this:
$ fink -m --build-as-nobody rebuild freeciv
Password:
Scanning package description
Anybody have any ideas about this one? Looks like libtool weirdness of some
kind to me...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kow KURODA kow.kur...@gmail.com
Date: January 19, 2010 6:53:32 AM PST
To: Dave Morrison d...@finkproject.org
Subject: installation of gd2 under Fink 0.29.10 failed
Hmmm... I'm sure I will hear objections about that, from people being forced to
install tetex-base just because some other package wants to use texinfo... I'm
cc-ing fink-devel to see if anybody has an ideas about working around this.
-- Dave
On Jan 11, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Schindler
This update has a potential problem with the revision numbers used: the stable
version was updated from .1 to .2, while the unstable version was updated from
.2 to .3, with the new stable .2 being different from the old unstable .2.
It's unlikely that this will cause any real trouble, but it
There are incompatibilities between perl 5.10.0 (which is /usr/bin/
perl in 10.6) and perl 5.8.8. To call bioperl-pm588 in other scripts,
you will have to modify their starting lines to #!/sw/bin/perl5.8.8
Better for you, probably, would be to have bioperl-pm updated to a
5.10.0 version
It's generally a good idea to move /usr/local/lib out of the way (e.g.
temporarily change its name) when compiling things with fink. Fink
has no way of preventing things in /usr/local/lib from overriding
things which fink is trying to find within its own distribution area,
and the results
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:19:14AM -0600, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On 11/09/2009 03:11 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
On 10.6/64bit, the 'Update' fields could have a renewed interest,
because many packages have config.guess versions that guess wrong.
On Nov 9, 2009, at 9:54 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
This is the problem fink now has with its Update* fields. Updating
the files that will be copied may fix some things, but may break
others.
Maybe we should introduce new fields for the new updates? With names
like
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:47 PM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion. I think the following way
You could have texlive-texmf *just*
Replaces it, and then supply an updated tetex-texmf that is empty
and just specifies Depends:texlive-texmf.
is a good solution, if Fink officially
Bill,
Writing to the maintainer (in this case None) was the correct course
of action.
I've just moved the unstable version to stable.
-- Dave
On Oct 3, 2009, at 12:34 PM, William G. Scott wrote:
I've inherited pymol and just got email from a user who I surmise is
trying to install the
;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
David Fang
http
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
will have little sympathy if our target breaks. Sad as we just fixed the
P1 that was threatening the primary target status yesterday.
No
one of the remaining powerpc-apple-darwin8 hold-outs,
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com
Fink cannot possibly support compiling in all situations,
particularly ones where Fink has no control over what has been
installed where (such as MacPorts).
I'm happy to learn that you see no compiling errors when you
uninstall MacPorts.
-- Dave
On Sep 26, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Norman
On Sep 23, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi folks,
unlike my usual custom (which includes never packaging pre-release
software), I am currently planning to package a SVN snapshot of SDL
1.2.14 (well, pre). The main reason is that this version should
compile across 10.4 to 10.6, all
Jack,
Fink uses the scripts /sw/bin/init.csh (for tcsh/csh) and /sw/bin/
init.sh (for bash) to initialize various things, so you may find what
you are looking for there.
-- Dave
On Sep 20, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Do we have any special treatment for tcsh or csh under
-0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
Jack,
Fink uses the scripts /sw/bin/init.csh (for tcsh/csh) and /sw/bin/
init.sh (for bash) to initialize various things, so you may find what
you are looking for there.
-- Dave
What exactly is the purpose of...
if ($?version) then
if ($version =~ tcsh
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 maintainer at
Apple as well as the
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr:
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already
on this. And you're welcome for
the patch. If you're going to resubmit a tracker item, someone can go
ahead and close mine.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
--
Let Crystal
Bill,
fftw and swig are now in stable, but as Dan discussed earlier, the
gnome prerequisites for pygtk2-gtk-py26 are going to have to wait a
while longer.
-- Dave
On Sep 5, 2009, at 2:39 PM, William G. Scott wrote:
I'm trying to migrate coot to stable, but several dependencies are in
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5370)
Can anyone else reproduce this?
I've submitted an update here (validated on powerpc-darwin8):
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2857895group_id=17203atid=414256
Could you please review and approve?
Thank you!
Fang
David Fang
alive. :D I do have an Intel Macbook on 10.5, but it's out-of-commission,
and constantly has problems. :(
Let me know if there's any more information you need about my compile
failure.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com
Under the circumstances, it is reasonable for you to take over.
Please do so.
-- Dave
On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Corey Halpin wrote:
I just put current versions of silc-client and silc-toolkit into my
experimental.
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2) At least one core maintainer had no objections to the
concept of upgrading those.
Jack,
Perhaps you misread the message in question, but in fact there WAS an
objection to the upgrade you proposed, but you went ahead and did it
anyway.
The time wasn't wasted. You did many good things here, and you will
be missed.
-- Dave
On Sep 11, 2009, at 8:52 AM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:16:55AM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
2
On Sep 11, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since it is
Dear Jack,
We are grateful for your many contributions to fink, and sorry to see
you go. Best wishes for the future.
Yours,
Dave
On Sep 10, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Daniel and Benjamin,
I've been pondering switching my efforts over to
MacPorts for awhile now since
Bill,
Isn't that going to break on powerpc?
-- Dave
On Sep 6, 2009, at 11:09 PM, William Scott wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci
In directory fdv4jf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9438
Modified Files:
mosflm.info
Log Message:
fix to force
On Sep 5, 2009, at 6:33 AM, monipol wrote:
On 05/09/2009, at 03:34, Saadat wrote:
My application uses components, which have GPL2, GPL, BSD and MIT
licenses.
Looking at the packaging instructions, it seems that I would have to
have
one license under which the application is released. If I
Fixed.
-- Dave
On Sep 5, 2009, at 5:23 PM, William G. Scott wrote:
Hi folks:
I started a clean stable 64-bit for 10.6 for purposes of testing
migration of some of my packages to stable.
Although gcc44 is in stable, its dependency libmpfr1 is not, so gcc44
won't build in stable.
Dear fink developers,
I have finished my pruning of the stable tree, removing from 10.6 or
x86_64 those packages which did not build for me there.
At this point, please feel free to make improvements to our 10.6-i386
and 10.6-x86_64 distributions. You can move packages to stable which
are
These patches may be of some assistance:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-text/pdftk/files/
Dave
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Jack Howarth howa...@bromo.med.uc.eduwrote:
Matthias,
I've uploaded the specfiles and patches associated with the
pdftk, itext and
On Aug 30, 2009, at 5:42 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Huh? What problems? I've have...
ii qt33.3.8-1028 Cross-Platform GUI application
framework
ii qt3-designer 3.3.8-1028 Cross-Platform GUI application
framework
ii qt3-designer-s 3.3.8-1028
On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:22 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Considering that Apple's X11 developers are recommending that
we tell user to nuke their installations and rebuild everything
from scratch under Snow Leopard as well as never install .la
files, why don't we take this
Unison[37227:10b] Calling nonGuiStartup
unison version 2.27.57
and it segfaults when I try to sync directories.
~ David
~$ sudo fink install unison
Linking unison
ocamlopt -verbose -I lwt -I ubase -I /sw/lib/ocaml/lablgtk2 -o
unison unix.cmxa str.cmxa lablgtk.cmxa str.cmxa ubase
On Aug 31, 2009, at 11:48 AM, William G. Scott wrote:
2. The 10.6 64-bit tree of fink is in a situation where things in
unstable work but in stable don't (older versions, no gfortran
4.4, etc). Maybe this is a good chance to move everything en masse
that works into stable.
Bill,
Yes, in a
Dear Fink developers,
Many of you will have noticed a lot of changes in the stable tree over
the past day. I am attempting to ensure that a user who installs Snow
Leopard on the day it is released, and sticks to the stable tree, will
not see any compile failures. I may or may not finish
cannot move them as gcc44 is not yet
stable.
Any plans to promote gcc44 to stable?
Thanks,
Remi
On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:32 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/stable/main/finkinfo/utils
In directory
fdv4jf1.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14808/main/finkinfo
Thanks, Jack.
For the current push to get the stable tree ready for 10.6 before
Friday, we'll suppress all of the gcc42 and gcc43 dependent packages
from 10.6 under both architectures. There will be plenty of time in
coming weeks to fix everything in unstable and then move to stable
when
Dear Fink developers,
This has finally been implemented, and all -py24 and -pm586 packages
should have now been tagged to restrict their Distribution to 10.4 and
10.5.
Package maintainers should check to see if their packages were
updated, and verify the correctness of the update.
There is another option, which is to host our lgpl.txt in fink's
sourceforge space. We've done that before when a checksum changed
unexpectedly -- its tricky to change the file on the fink mirrors
without changing the filename. The only change in info files would be
to redirect the
I checked that all the dependencies are in stable, and moved these to
stable.
-- Dave
On Jul 30, 2009, at 5:28 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Jul 30, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Michael Brickenstein wrote:
Hi!
I am the maintainer of the singular package and I would like to ask
you to move the
You need to choose the sourceforge option.
On Jul 14, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
David,
Still no luck here...
curl --connect-timeout 30 -f -L -A 'fink/0.29.99.cvs' -O
http://distfiles.master.finkmirrors.net/incrtcl-20071231cvs.tgz
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed
for the itcl-x86_64
variant and the itk-20071231cvs.tgz file for the itk-x86_64 variant.
Unless I am confused, David Morrison (after some initial confusion)
finally placed those tarballs on the fink servers (which aren't
available
otherwise since they are custom cvs tarballs). We seem to have lost
.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=2810042group_id=17203atid=414256
Once this is in decent shape, I'll work on -plugins to separate out the
extension language plugins.
Thanks for reviewing and thanks for your patience.
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http
revision? What makes more sense?
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
--
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http
On Jun 20, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
Hi Koen !
Unpacking module-build-pm5100-bin (from .../module-build-pm5100-
bin_0.33-1_darwin-i386.deb) ...
/sw/bin/dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-
On Jun 29, 2009, at 2:18 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 09:29:21PM -0700, David R. Morrison wrote:
Actually, /sw/bin/config_data is perfectly appropriate, since only
one module-build-pmXXX package should be installed at a time.
The only problem here is that the perl5100
' language plug-ins)
graphviz (with x11, gtk+pangocairo, all the fixins
Fang)
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com/
--
___
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink
with the packaging manual and some examples (emacs22.info, vim.info). I
need a little advice on which dependencies I can drop for -nox. For
example, can I remove all of the gnome, gtk, pango, cairo deps?
'fangism'
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com
(if it matters), intel processors. There
was a confirmation that 10.4.11 on a ppc shows the same error.
Dave
--
David Reiser
dbrei...@earthlink.net
--
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises
Yes, I also had an email directly from a user about this. It
mystifies me.
Your message has more information, so I'll try to investigate a bit.
-- Dave
On Jun 2, 2009, at 7:55 PM, David Reiser wrote:
Prompted by someone on the gnucash list, I tried rebuilding tetex-base
3.0-1006
the package gnucash2 is installed, you launch it by typing
gnucash in a terminal or x-terminal window.
Dave
--
David Reiser
dbrei...@earthlink.net
--
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
On May 17, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 17 May 2009, at 19:21, Jack Howarth wrote:
ps I ran into this when trying to build intltool40 with
'fink -m install' which showed testsuite failures due to
the missing compression related perlmods (which can't be
installed due
Jack,
Is there any chance that the environment you ran these commands under
is polluted by an i386 copy of fink?
-- Dave
On May 16, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
In an attempt to fix the missing dependency on the
intltool40 for building gnuplot under the new x86_64
Leopard
Dear Fink developers,
I am pleased to announce that fink can now run in exclusive 64bit mode
on intel hardware, using the new x86_64 architecture available for
the 10.5 distribution (and later). As of fink-0.29.5, a permanent
architecture for fink must be selected when fink is initially
On May 10, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Koen van der Drift wrote:
A package I maintain has some optional components that are downloaded
during the install phase inside the expanded tarball. Is this allowed,
or should I pre-download everything and then copy it into the expanded
tarball?
You should
Jack,
The ccp4 package is labeled License: Commercial rather than
License: Restrictive, and that may be appropriate here as well --
as Max pointed out to you, this package does not meet anybody's
definition of open source.
As far as circumventing the usual fink tools for downloading goes,
On Apr 15, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
So it is completely legal in fink to go ahead and upgrade a package
(gmp-4.3.0, ppl-0.10.1 and fftw3-2.3.1) which has bumped the
compatibility level but not the major soversion number
Yes, completely legal.
as long
as you insure that all
Oh man. This is going to be a general problem. It turns out that we
are using powerpc as the value for %m, but /usr/bin/arch wants ppc
instead.
There are three possible solutions to this, and I'd like to open it up
to general discussion which one we should adopt. One solution is to
version: 3.81
Feedback Courtesy of FinkCommander
You'd be much better off with gnucash2. The 1.8.x series has a very
inconsistent history when run on intel macs. 1.8.12 isn't even in the
fink trees anymore.
Dave
--
David Reiser
dbrei...@earthlink.net
Folks,
I made some changes in fink today which cause problems when directly
injecting from cvs HEAD. The workaround is:
cd perlmods/Fink
cp FinkVersion.pm.in FinkVersion.pm
and then edit FinkVersion.pm, replacing @VERSION@, @BASEPATH@, and
@ARCHITECTURE@ by the appropriate values.
On Mar 9, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 09 Mar 2009, at 18:42, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0100, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens
wrote:
I get the following error, with io-compress-bzip2-pm5100, io-
compress-
zlib-pm5100,
libwww-pm5100, probably
It sounds to me as if /sw/lib/libopenbabel.3.dylib should be a
symbolic link to /sw/lib/libopenbabel.3.0.0.dylib (according to the
info file), but is not (according to the validator). Can you verify
in your built package what the status of /sw/lib/libopenbabel.3.dylib
is?
-- Dave
On
fink-buildlock-pidgin-2.5.4-1 ...
Updating the list of locally available binary packages.
Scanning dists/local/main/binary-darwin-powerpc
Any idea how to fix?
Thanks in advance!
Fang
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com
Offending line: inherited_linker_flags=' -framework IOKit
[...more of the same...]
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
Any idea how to fix?
Thanks in advance!
David Fang
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/
http://www.achronix.com
On Jan 22, 2009, at 3:43 PM, James Bunton wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:43:53PM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
snip
3) We could potentially try doing the dreaded third-party system
scheme again, cf.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
Jack,
What's important for linking on OS X is not the filename, but rather
the install_name of the shared library. You can check the
install_name with otool -L foo.dylib.
Most likely, in the older version the filename of the library was
libGLw.1.0.dylib but the install_name was
A source file which has an unrecognized suffix is simply copied into
the build directory by Fink, and not unpacked. Thus, a PatchScript of
the form
unlzma foo.lzma | tar xf -
should work to unpack the source.
(Of course, I don't know the actual name of the binary for un-lzma-
ing, or its
Bill,
There are problems with doing so, since libtool and autoconf based
packages can't easily compile things universal by default. I know
that RangerRick has played with this some in the past, and he
developed some automatic procedures which worked for probably 80% of
all packages, but
On Nov 24, 2008, at 6:51 AM, Damian Dimmich wrote:
Alexander Hansen wrote:
$ perl -MStorable -e 'print $Storable::VERSION \n'
2.13
Hi - Are you saying the dmg installers listed here
http://www.finkproject.org/download/index.php?phpLang=en
dont work?
The installers work, IF perl is
There have been various problems reported with fink's gnucash package,
which is rather old. The gnucash2 package is much more up-to-date
(but you'll have to build it from source, which means installing XCode
and so on).
-- Dave
On Oct 24, 2008, at 6:38 AM, Jason Turner wrote:
I just
On Oct 20, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
David Reiser wrote:
[]
I've looked at this some more, and I think it's simpler. html-parser
looks to me to be provided by both 5.8.6 and 5.8.8, but html-tree is
provided by neither. Consequently, I think the fix is to delete line
339
On Oct 19, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
David Reiser wrote:
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
There is, however, also a real html-tree-pm588 package. Run
fink install html-tree-pm588
and see if this helps.
That at least solves the building problem
On Oct 18, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
David Reiser wrote:
How does fink 'know' what packages are provided?
fink list html-tree gives (10.5.5 ppc):
Information about 7253 packages read in 2 seconds.
html-tree-pm586 3.23-1 Handling information
from
201 - 300 of 1724 matches
Mail list logo
