Re: [Fink-devel] Shared Libraries Policy, round 2

2002-02-13 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
At this point, it'd be cleaner to do something like the debian/control file, where the subpackage-specific pieces broken into separate chunks, separated by a blank line, each headed with its own "Package:" field. Munging this information into the names of the fields themselves is not a pretty thin

Re: [Fink-devel] gnumeric & gabber crashes

2002-02-05 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
Cool. My gtk+ was apparently already linked against the right version, but my gnome-libs and gdk-pixbuf were not, so I updated just those and gnumeric works a-okay for me now too. Thanks! Any ideas on a clean way to automate this kind of dependency on an Apple-provided lib? -jp On Mon, 4 Feb

Re: [Fink-devel] gnumeric & gabber crashes -> libsigc++, gtkmm,gnomemm

2002-02-03 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Max Horn wrote: > OK, weird. But I see now that I was mistaken regarding gnumeric, I > only took a brief glance at the BT, saw "marshal", "signal", "emit" > etc. and thought "oh, sigc++". Obviously that was wrong, stupid > little me :) > > Anyway, I have latest gnumeric install

Re: [Fink-devel] info file format

2002-01-17 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
On 17 Jan 2002, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > YAML is very data-centric (fine for machine-to-machine communication, > but a bit awkward for human to machine or even human to human), > however, and indent sensitive (think "python"). I'd vote against > moving from RFC822-header-style info files (at p

Re: [Fink-devel] info file format

2002-01-16 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote: > ...as has been discussed several times in the past, yeah, and was one > of the original reasons we started talking about switching to a > different package format in the future, with XML being one > possibility. Here's one more: YAML. Details at www.yaml.or

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs apt-get

2002-01-16 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote: > On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 09:33 pm, Max Horn wrote: >> Oh and to mention one more difference: count the number of active >> debian developers. The count the total number of active fink >> developers. Compare the numbers. Think. > > And compare

Re: [Fink-devel] fink vs apt-get

2002-01-16 Thread El JoPe Magnifico
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote: > With fink, for every package there is an .info file (and possibly a > .patch file, too). Fink then uses the data from this .info file to > retrieve the source tarball(s), expand them, patch them, compile > everything, and then package it into a .deb (this is