Re: [Fink-devel] I migrated sbcl-1.0.29 to 10.4 and 10.5 stable

2009-12-08 Thread Leigh Smith
Fine from my POV. Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:[email protected] http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith -- Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net

Re: [Fink-devel] SBCL-1.0.25/Intel on the tracker

2009-05-05 Thread Leigh Smith
wo architectures means that I would have to do that for >> maxima >> (which could be done, but I'd rather not). > Leigh -- Leigh M. Smith mailto:[email protected] http://www.leighsmith.com skype:aussieleighsmith

Re: [Fink-devel] xfig crash

2008-05-24 Thread Mike Dyall-Smith
10.5.2, and the latest Fink. Can't work out how to get the xquartz version although I think this is the most recent (why can't I go 'xquartz --version'?, or 'man xquartz' ?). - Mike Dyall-Smith On 25/05/2008, at 11:10 AM, Sebastian N. Fischmeister wrote: > Hel

[Fink-devel] ARB phylogeny package on Tiger

2007-11-12 Thread Mike Dyall-Smith
'int*' to 'GLint*'. I have seen discussions of this kind of error but I would appreciate some expert assistance on how to patch the ARB code. Thanks, Mike Dyall-Smith, mlds (AT) unimelb (DOT) edu.au ---

[Fink-devel] Re: [lajug] Your Windows XP Logo Only Policy

2003-03-24 Thread Christopher Smith
for Windows XP", because I sure would be surprised if Microsoft was willing to give RedHat the right to put that sticker on (and for that matter I don't think RedHat would want it). -- Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Th

[Fink-devel] Re: package xtail - correct man-page directory

2002-05-17 Thread smith
Yes, I think you're right. They should be in /sw/share/man. ber On Friday, May 17, 2002, at 01:20 AM, Thomas Kotzian wrote: > where should main-pages be kept - in /sw/share/man - isn't it? > > i found that in some packages the man pages are in /sw/man - is this > correct??? > > for ex