On 04 Sep 2006, at 12:32, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Benjamin Reed wrote:
>> I did some investigation of the node exists errors, and I think
>> they are
>> completely bogus (at least, while I agree we shouldn't have gotten to
>> that point in the code path in the first place, I believe it is
>>
Benjamin Reed wrote:
> I did some investigation of the node exists errors, and I think they are
> completely bogus (at least, while I agree we shouldn't have gotten to
> that point in the code path in the first place, I believe it is entirely
> legal to ignore the error).
>
> I've done some Dat
03 Sep 2006 19:44:49 -0400
> From: Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Fink-devel] "node exists" errors
> To: fink-devel
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I did some investigation of
I did some investigation of the node exists errors, and I think they are
completely bogus (at least, while I agree we shouldn't have gotten to
that point in the code path in the first place, I believe it is entirely
legal to ignore the error).
I've done some Data::Dumper debugging, and basicall
