Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-26 Thread TheSin
no problem at all, we have been hard at work getting bindists back up and running so I'm very happy to see people using them and reporting bugs so that we can get this very valuable part of fink back up and running for everyone. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-26 Thread Martin Costabel
On 26/11/13 19:26, TheSin wrote: > the issue was that apt was converting _ into %5f in the debarch > darwin-x86_64 = darwin-x86%5f64 in the deb file name. So fink could never > find it and thus thought it wasn't present. > The fix for this is now in git. It works. Thanks for finding this so qu

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-26 Thread TheSin
the issue was that apt was converting _ into %5f in the debarch darwin-x86_64 = darwin-x86%5f64 in the deb file name. So fink could never find it and thus thought it wasn't present. The fix for this is now in git. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live betwe

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread TheSin
I completely agree, I just need to check the code (since I'm un familiar with it) but since it knows to call apt-get there should be a way to know it's using the bindist and to not run the lock. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 11/25/13 4:34 PM, TheSin wrote: > but build depends should not be required to simply install a deb, so does > this mean build lock needs an if so it can ignore builddeps if it's > installing via bindist. Since most of this code was down and tweaked for the > years we didn't' have a bindist a

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread TheSin
but build depends should not be required to simply install a deb, so does this mean build lock needs an if so it can ignore builddeps if it's installing via bindist. Since most of this code was down and tweaked for the years we didn't' have a bindist avail I suppose that is no surprise. I'll h

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread Alexander Hansen
On 11/25/13 3:34 PM, TheSin wrote: > would these happen to be runtimdeps per chance? > --- > TS > http://www.southofheaven.org/ > Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > > On 2013-11-25, at 3:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >>> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread TheSin
would these happen to be runtimdeps per chance? --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-11-25, at 3:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > On 25/11/13 13:27, Martin Costabel wrote: > [] >> The result is that Fink correctly downloaded the deb

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread Martin Costabel
On 25/11/13 13:27, Martin Costabel wrote: [] > The result is that Fink correctly downloaded the debs from the bindist > server, but then went ahead and compiled them from source anyway, > without apologizing in any way. An example output is shown below. It is actually worse. In that example, the i