Re: [Fink-devel] 10.12-friendly packaging

2016-08-21 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Aug 21, 2016, at 15:52, TheSin wrote: > > feel free if you have a working version, I don’t have 10.12 installed yet and > I”d need to reinstall master fink to test anything since i run my PR > currently. unless you means it’s just a dist update, maybe I can just merge > now and have one

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.12-friendly packaging

2016-08-21 Thread TheSin
feel free if you have a working version, I don’t have 10.12 installed yet and I”d need to reinstall master fink to test anything since i run my PR currently. unless you means it’s just a dist update, maybe I can just merge now and have one file? --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins

[Fink-devel] 10.12-friendly packaging

2016-08-21 Thread Alexander Hansen
I have 10.12-compatible .info files for the following packages. Rather than dumping them on the tracker or the mailing list, could the respective maintainers contact me and I’ll either add the updates or send them out to you for evaluation? Thanks in advance. Maintainer: Daniel Macks langu

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.12

2016-07-30 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 06:54, isb...@verizon.net wrote: > > Thanks Alexander, > > I was meaning to weigh in on Fink 10.12. I was able to make minor changes to > the bootstrap routines and successfully built a distribution under Sierra > Public Beta #2. > > One key point was to NOT ask to downl

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.12

2016-07-29 Thread isbell
Thanks Alexander,I was meaning to weigh in on Fink 10.12. I was able to make minor changes to the bootstrap routines and successfully built a distribution under Sierra Public Beta #2.One key point was to NOT ask to download binary distributions (since 10.12 doesn't exist on the mirrors yet).Unfortu

[Fink-devel] 10.12

2016-07-28 Thread Alexander Hansen
Hey, folks. Does anybody happen to know if there are any huge changes for building on 10.12 vs. older OS X? Specifically, I’m most concerned with changes that might entail creating a new distribution tree, like a new default C++ ABI or anything else that would preclude upgrading a Fink tree in