Re: [Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 no longer supportable?

2004-08-17 Thread gecko
Am 17.08.2004 um 23:45 schrieb Martin Costabel: Benjamin Reed wrote: It appears that Apple no longer offers the August 2003 updater for GCC 3.3 on ADC any more. Does anyone have a copy, and know whether it's still distributable? Otherwise, we might have to offer a gcc3.3 package (ugh) or stop

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 no longer supportable?

2004-08-17 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: It appears that Apple no longer offers the August 2003 updater for GCC 3.3 on ADC any more. Does anyone have a copy, and know whether it's still distributable? Otherwise, we might have to offer a gcc3.3 package (ugh) or stop supporting 10.2 altogether. Has anyone ever done

[Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 no longer supportable?

2004-08-05 Thread Benjamin Reed
It appears that Apple no longer offers the August 2003 updater for GCC 3.3 on ADC any more. Does anyone have a copy, and know whether it's still distributable? Otherwise, we might have to offer a gcc3.3 package (ugh) or stop supporting 10.2 altogether. -- Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. Ranger Rick [EM

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 vs. 10.3 trees (long)

2004-02-01 Thread Benjamin Reed
Dave Vasilevsky wrote: On Jan 31, 2004, at 7:54 PM, James Gibbs wrote: I made a list of packages in 10.2-gcc3.3 that have not yet been moved to the 10.3 tree. How about a list sorted by maintainer? That helps a lot usually. Or you can use the compare-trees.pl script at the top of the trees, w

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 vs. 10.3 trees (long)

2004-02-01 Thread Dave Vasilevsky
On Jan 31, 2004, at 7:54 PM, James Gibbs wrote: I made a list of packages in 10.2-gcc3.3 that have not yet been moved to the 10.3 tree. How about a list sorted by maintainer? That helps a lot usually. Dave PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 vs. 10.3 trees (long)

2004-01-31 Thread James Gibbs
I made a list of packages in 10.2-gcc3.3 that have not yet been moved to the 10.3 tree. Caveats: I only looked in the unstable trees. Some of the packages have been moved, renamed, deprecated or wrapped into other packages. Some don't make sense to be moved -- like a lot of stuff in gnome. I co

Re: [Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 vs 10.3 re X11 and freetype2

2003-10-12 Thread Benjamin Reed
Martin Costabel wrote: The question is whether this could be used as an opportunity to scrap Fink's freetype2 packages. I believe it is. We should dump freetype2 altogether, but we can't just "provide" freetype2 from the xfree86 packages. Currently, just to get people testing the panther tree

[Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 : tar confilcts with gettext-bin

2003-10-12 Thread Martin Costabel
In my continuing rebuild of 10.2-gcc3.3, I came across the following crash: Unpacking gettext-bin (from .../gettext-bin_0.10.40-17_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/base/gettext-bin_0.10.40-17_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install): trying t

[Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3 vs 10.3 re X11 and freetype2

2003-10-12 Thread Martin Costabel
AFAICT, there will be one difference between 10.2-gcc3.3 and 10.3, namely the support for X11: Since P. comes with X11, which will be xfree86-4.3, it doesn't make sense to support XF-4.2 any more. OTOH, in 10.2-gcc3.3, XF-4.2 still has to be supported, at least to accomodate Apple's X11-beta3 w

[Fink-devel] 10.2-gcc3.3

2003-09-22 Thread David R. Morrison
The 10.2-gcc3.3/stable tree is coming along nicely, and I hope to declare "phase one" of this migration to be finished within a few days. To this end, I would like to declare a code freeze on 10.2/stable, effective immediately. To make sure that 10.2/stable and 10.2-gcc3.3/stable are as close to