Re: [Fink-devel] 32-bits apps in the 64-bit branch

2010-06-10 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 06:24:59PM +0200, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote: > > On 10 Jun 2010, at 17:34, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > > On 6/10/10 11:28 AM, Pepe Barbe wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I am trying to update the sleepwatcher. This package links against > >> carbon so it is 32-bits only. I

Re: [Fink-devel] 32-bits apps in the 64-bit branch

2010-06-10 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 10 Jun 2010, at 17:34, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/10/10 11:28 AM, Pepe Barbe wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to update the sleepwatcher. This package links against >> carbon so it is 32-bits only. I would like to make the package so >> that it could be installed also from within the

Re: [Fink-devel] 32-bits apps in the 64-bit branch

2010-06-10 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/10/10 11:28 AM, Pepe Barbe wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to update the sleepwatcher. This package links against carbon so > it is 32-bits only. I would like to make the package so that it could be > installed also from within the 64-bit branc

[Fink-devel] 32-bits apps in the 64-bit branch

2010-06-10 Thread Pepe Barbe
Hello, I am trying to update the sleepwatcher. This package links against carbon so it is 32-bits only. I would like to make the package so that it could be installed also from within the 64-bit branch, but I don't what is the policy in this regard. If possible, then the other issue I have bee