Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-17 Thread Ken Williams
On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 10:14 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: > Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >>> I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I >>> get it running on my own machine, overwriting Appl

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > > I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I > > get it running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version > > 1.3. > > The other day I asked about packaging later

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 12:56 AM, Ken Williams wrote: > On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >> I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I get it >> running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version 1.3. > > The other day I asked about

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread Ken Williams
On Wednesday, April 17, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote: > I would like to try to help package Apache 2.0 in Fink after I > get it running on my own machine, overwriting Apple's version > 1.3. The other day I asked about packaging later versions of perl, and was told that fink overwriti

Re: [Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread Chris Devers
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote: > I was looking at Apache 2.0 and I decided to install it on my system. Not sure how helpful this is, but you might want to take a look here: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/macosx/httpd-apache_2.0.35-powerpc-apple-darwin5.3.tar.gz Despite the

[Fink-devel] Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread Kyle Moffett
I was looking at Apache 2.0 and I decided to install it on my system. I looked at the patches it needs for Mac OS X, and one is for the libtool. Can someone please clear up the issue of '-undefined error/warning' vs. '-undefined suppress -flat_namespace' in ltconfig. Can someone please tell