Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11 0.2 Beta out, and questions.

2003-02-10 Thread Martin Costabel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that the 0.2 version of Apple's X11 is out, I wanted to confirm that there is no Fink problem if it is installed. Specifically, I also wanted to ask if we should / need to re-run Ben Hines' script to correct the install_names thingamahoozit. This is no longer

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 07:48 pm, Finlay Dobbie wrote: The user install download link at http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ is broken currently. The SDK posted there won't help anyone, its just libraries and headers. The text link in the sidebar works, the graphic one which

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 07:44 pm, Ben Hines wrote: dpkg -r --force-depends xfree86-base dpkg -r --force-depends xfree86-base-shlibs For most of us that should probably be xfree86-base-threaded, xfree86-base-threaded-shlibs, xfree86-rootless-threaded and

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 12:26 PM, David R. Morrison wrote: Another relevant link, which may indicate which way the wind is blowing, long-term: http://www.opendarwin.org/projects/darwinports/en/x11.php I somehow doubt that. .pkg files are a huge step backwards, even the

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Tuesday, Jan 7, 2003, at 14:34 US/Eastern, Finlay Dobbie wrote: http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ Just thought y'all should know :-) Hot DAMN!!! This looks like apple took the existing XDarwin.app and added a bunch of small little things that make it just a little nicer to work with

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread John Davidorff Pell
I'm scared. ;) This looks a LOT like OroborOSX. anyone agree? JP http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ Just thought y'all should know :-) -- Finlay --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM +

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Mike
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 09:24 PM, John Davidorff Pell wrote: This looks a LOT like OroborOSX. anyone agree? No. I'm using the Smoothstripes Square theme and all the Apple X11 windows are too. OroborOSX simply uses a theme that looks like Aqua.

[Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Finlay Dobbie
http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ Just thought y'all should know :-) -- Finlay --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Ben Hines
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Finlay Dobbie wrote: http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ Just thought y'all should know :-) -- Finlay The user install download link at http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ is broken currently. The SDK posted there won't help anyone, its just

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 07:44 pm, Ben Hines wrote: The user install download link at http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ is broken currently. The SDK posted there won't help anyone, its just libraries and headers. The text link in the sidebar works, the graphic one which links

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread David R. Morrison
Another relevant link, which may indicate which way the wind is blowing, long-term: http://www.opendarwin.org/projects/darwinports/en/x11.php -- Dave On Jan 7,2003 19:34:12 +, Finlay Dobbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/ Just thought y'all should know :-)

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple's X11

2003-01-07 Thread Chris Dolan
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 01:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote: The user install download link at http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ is broken currently. The SDK posted there won't help anyone, its just libraries and headers. For those who want to try it out later, when the download works.