On 11/17/05, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> []
> > It does indeed look to be that the newer gcc version isn't tolerant of
> > these irregularities, since with XCode 2.1 the package builds.
>
> I changed the jpilot.patch file in CVS correspondingly. Does th
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
It does indeed look to be that the newer gcc version isn't tolerant of
these irregularities, since with XCode 2.1 the package builds.
I changed the jpilot.patch file in CVS correspondingly. Does this work?
--
Martin
On 11/16/05, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> []
> > | #include
> > | int
> > | main ()
> > | {
> > |
> > | int main()
> > | {
>
> It is rather surprising that earlier gcc versions accepted such
> ridiculous code. I think this nested main() comes from a bro
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
[]
| #include
| int
| main ()
| {
|
| int main()
| {
It is rather surprising that earlier gcc versions accepted such
ridiculous code. I think this nested main() comes from a broken
configure.in file. The authors didn't bother to look up how to use the
AC_TRY_COMPI
OS 10.4.3, XCode 2.2, X.org
(/usr/local safely out of the way)
-
$ fink list pilot-link
Information about 5205 packages read in 6 seconds.
i pilot-link90.11.8-35Palm libraries
i pilot-link9-bin0.11.8-35Palm libraries
pilot-link9-per
