At 17:27 Uhr -0500 16.02.2003, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Actually, there is a runtime issue here too. If you wind up switching
gtkhtml1.1 to gtkhtml, then you can't open/reply to messages in
Evolution 1.2.x--there is an error message saying words to the effect of
"HTML component couldn't be activat
Actually, there is a runtime issue here too. If you wind up switching
gtkhtml1.1 to gtkhtml, then you can't open/reply to messages in
Evolution 1.2.x--there is an error message saying words to the effect of
"HTML component couldn't be activated"
In my case the prs that gnucash depends on gnome-c
At 20:13 Uhr +0100 16.02.2003, thomas kotzian wrote:
i wanted to install evolution but there are other packages installed
that depend on gtkhtml and evolution wants to have gtkhtml1.1
installed.
here is the trace:
dpkg -i /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/
gtkhtml1.1_1
i wanted to install evolution but there are other packages installed
that depend on gtkhtml and evolution wants to have gtkhtml1.1 installed.
here is the trace:
dpkg -i
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/gnome/
gtkhtml1.1_1.1.7-2_darwin-powerpc.deb
dpkg: considering removing
I have problems with the unstable evolution 1.0.3-1.
I have fink cvs-updated with unstables to this evening, and 10.1.3
and 12/01 DevTools.
Most of the times I get immediately after the main window opens:
evolution-shell-WARNING **:
Error changing interactive status of component
OAFIID:GNOME_
Is anyone currently working on porting Evolution? In reading the
archives, it appears that it's been attempted before, but I've no idea
of it's current state. I was thinking of working on that, but this'd be
my first OS X port (it's also been a while since I've other than dabbled
in C/C++).
Well, sadly I lost the patch so most of my work is in my head. I'll try to
write another one in the next few days, but it takes forever to compile. If
someone wants to email me instructions on using Code Warrior to link it, I
heard that speeds it up. If not it will be there in a couple of days.
this isn't always good :P, but i agree when someone starts something
doable they should start a tracker item.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>This just seems to be one of those packages that keeps getting worked on
>and then abandoned, it would be nice if the next people who try have
>somewhere to s
Patrick Tescher wrote:
> I got pretty far, just had a few problems with undefined variables in
> the
> calendar section. If you or anyone wants to try, I can help them.
Would you mind putting your work so far (a patch file would be great)
somewhere everybody can see? I'd recommend the tracker i
I got pretty far, just had a few problems with undefined variables in the
calendar section. If you or anyone wants to try, I can help them.
> Has there been any progress on porting Evolution? I realize it is a bit
> of a nightmare since it depends on a zillion rapidly changing libraries.
>
> I'
Has there been any progress on porting Evolution? I realize it is a bit
of a nightmare since it depends on a zillion rapidly changing libraries.
I've had problems getting it to build in current versions of ports under
FreeBSD as well.
--
Jon Dugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
