At 18:19 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
>>At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>>On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote:
At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>I feel kind of
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 06:00 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>>> At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could
>>
At 17:54 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote:
>>At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>>I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could
>>>update itself to the latest cvs would be helpful
>>
>>"fink selfup
On Tuesday, April 16, 2002, at 09:46 AM, Max Horn wrote:
> At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink could update
>> itself to the latest cvs would be helpful
>
> "fink selfupdate-cvs"
>
> It's already there. All essential packa
At 6:42 Uhr -0400 16.04.2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
>
>>At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>>>I have a proposal to make:
>>>
>>>Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package
>>>manager newer than the latest bin
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> I feel kind of stupid now, but maybe something where Fink
> could update itself to the latest cvs would be helpful
% sudo fink selfupdate-cvs
?
--
Chris Devers[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache / mod_perl / http://homepage.ma
On Monday, April 15, 2002, at 10:44 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
> At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> I have a proposal to make:
>>
>> Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package
>> manager newer than the latest bindist should include a FinkVersion tag
>> that would
At 10:32 PM -0400 4/15/02, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>I have a proposal to make:
>
>Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package
>manager newer than the latest bindist should include a FinkVersion
>tag that would be checked at package read time. If the number is
>greater than the
I have a proposal to make:
Fink packages in unstable-cvs and stable-cvs requiring a package manager
newer than the latest bindist should include a FinkVersion tag that
would be checked at package read time. If the number is greater than
the presently installed PM, Fink should warn the user an