On Apr 8, 2008, at 12:03 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:15:35PM -0400, Daniel Johnson wrote:
On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote:
I'm testing a new version of the lpsolve-java package, but it's not
validating because it includes a private library without a Shli
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:15:35PM -0400, Daniel Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> >I'm testing a new version of the lpsolve-java package, but it's not
> >validating because it includes a private library without a Shlibs
> >declaration. Obviously, the fix is
On 08 Apr 2008, at 02:59, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually, I just looked; according to
>> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Java/Conceptual/
>> Java14Development/05-CoreJavaAPIs/CoreJavaAPIs.html
>> they allow jnilibs to be dylibs or bundles.
>
> Yes, but it w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trevor Harmon wrote:
| $ otool -hv /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib
| /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib:
| Mach header
|magic cputype cpusubtype capsfiletype ncmds
| sizeofcmds flags
| MH_MAGICI386ALL 0x00 DYLIB12
On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Trevor Harmon wrote:
> | On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> |> out of curiosity, what does "otool -hv /sw/lib/
> liblpsolve55j.jnilib"
> |> print?
> |
> | $ otool -L /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib
>
> not otool -L, otool -hv. =)
O
Benjamin Reed wrote:
>
> Actually, I just looked; according to
> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Java/Conceptual/Java14Development/05-CoreJavaAPIs/CoreJavaAPIs.html
> they allow jnilibs to be dylibs or bundles.
Yes, but it will break if the jnilib is a flat namespace dylib, so if it
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Reed wrote:
| out of curiosity, what does "otool -hv /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib"
| print? It should say it's of filetype BUNDLE instead of filetype DYLIB,
| in which case I don't think it could have a pathless otool line.
|
| If that is th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trevor Harmon wrote:
| On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
|> out of curiosity, what does "otool -hv /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib"
|> print?
|
| $ otool -L /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib
not otool -L, otool -hv. =)
- --
Benjamin Reed a.k.
On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
out of curiosity, what does "otool -hv /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib"
print?
$ otool -L /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib
/sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib:
liblpsolve55j.jnilib (compatibility version 5.5.0, current version
5.5.0)
/sw/lib/liblpsolve.5.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trevor Harmon wrote:
| That fixed it. I had to change the Shlibs line from this:
|
| !%p/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib
|
| to this:
|
| !liblpsolve55j.jnilib
out of curiosity, what does "otool -hv /sw/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib"
print? It should say it's o
On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
> It is indeed a bug, which I've previously reported. The problem is
> that the validator is checking the library's install_name but
> telling you to use the actual pathname in the error message. These
> are not necessarily the same thing. So
On Apr 7, 2008, at 4:56 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> Was there any other warning in the build log just prior to the
> complaint about the private shlib?
I don't see any warnings at all. The only error is this:
Validating .deb dir /sw/src/fink.build/root-lpsolve-java-5.5.0.11-1...
Error: package c
On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote:
I'm testing a new version of the lpsolve-java package, but it's not
validating because it includes a private library without a Shlibs
declaration. Obviously, the fix is to add the Shlib declaration, but
for some reason it's not working. What
On 08 Apr 2008, at 01:48, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
>> Try variations..
>> I remember that originally at least this was extremely sensitive to
>> spacing..
>> (conceivably removing the space after the colon, or replacing the
>> thing by
>>
>>
On Apr 7, 2008, at 7:48 PM, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
>> Try variations..
>> I remember that originally at least this was extremely sensitive to
>> spacing..
>> (conceivably removing the space after the colon, or replacing the
>> thing by
>>
On Apr 7, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> Try variations..
> I remember that originally at least this was extremely sensitive to
> spacing..
> (conceivably removing the space after the colon, or replacing the
> thing by
>
> Shlibs: <<
> !%p/lib/liblpsolve55j.jnilib
> <<
>
> wi
On 08 Apr 2008, at 01:16, Trevor Harmon wrote:
> I'm testing a new version of the lpsolve-java package, but it's not
> validating because it includes a private library without a Shlibs
> declaration. Obviously, the fix is to add the Shlib declaration,
> but for some reason it's not working.
I'm testing a new version of the lpsolve-java package, but it's not
validating because it includes a private library without a Shlibs
declaration. Obviously, the fix is to add the Shlib declaration, but
for some reason it's not working. What I've added looks like this:
Shlibs: !%p/lib/liblp
18 matches
Mail list logo
