Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Max Horn
At 19:48 Uhr +0100 25.11.2002, jfm wrote: On Monday, Nov 25, 2002, at 19:32 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: However, there is a catch: to submit the item, the user has to be logged in on the sourceforge site. So, you'd also have to query the users SF.net username and password, then authentica

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
true enough, but if the finkcommander users email was the finkcommander mailing list. well then we'd just be assuming they are on the list which could very likely not be true. Well it's an idea i guess. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >That is a serious run on sentence, justin. :) > >Anyway that would

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Ben Hines
That is a serious run on sentence, justin. :) Anyway that wouldn't really work.. Users need their own accounts so they will get our requests for more information.. -Ben On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 10:45 AM, Justin Hallett wrote: or if we made a finkcommander user perhaps or made the sf u

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
this is true but it has to be done somehow i believe it is a cookie on your system with that browser and since FC wouldn't necessarily use your browser for a POST request it'd need it's own as Max suggested. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >It is still true with the new 'remember' facility on SF ? >I've

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread jfm
On Monday, Nov 25, 2002, at 19:32 Europe/Brussels, Max Horn wrote: However, there is a catch: to submit the item, the user has to be logged in on the sourceforge site. So, you'd also have to query the users SF.net username and password, then authenticate to the site, store the cookie you get

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
or if we made a finkcommander user perhaps or made the sf user name/password in the configure options I think opening the bug tracker to the public isn't 100% bad but I think it's fine the way it is now and we'd need a way to check bugs first to make sure it's not already reported, but I think in t

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Max Horn
At 9:35 Uhr -0700 25.11.2002, Justin Hallett wrote: is there any way to interact with the sf.net tracker and get FC to acctually submit the bug it's self? I thought about that, too. It is possible in theory, by sending the HTTP POST etc. However, there is a catch: to submit the item, the user

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
is there any way to interact with the sf.net tracker and get FC to acctually submit the bug it's self? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >As such, I wonder if it would be possible to change the Feedback >feature yet again a bit... maybe one could provide a "Report a bug" >command, which would open the l

[Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Max Horn
Regarding the FinkCommmander feedback issue.. In the last few days, I have gotten a lot of feedback mails sent via FinkCommander that constitute bug reports. That's not so nice for me, as it's quite hard to track issues sent to me via email - they easily get lost in the suffle (I get hundreds