Re: [Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Justin Hallett
or you can add -I/sw/share/gengetopt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >For now I just BuildDepends on gengetopt and then copy >/sw/share/gengetopt/* into the source dir during the PatchScript to >replace the very old version of getopt included with the source. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rend

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Monday, Jan 20, 2003, at 19:34 US/Eastern, Carsten Klapp wrote: Hi Dan, I'll send it to you directly. I searched Google for getopt_long and found a few people complained that autogen doesn't properly check for getopt_long but found no solution. There may not be an answer, as I understand it

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Carsten Klapp
Hi Dan, I'll send it to you directly. I searched Google for getopt_long and found a few people complained that autogen doesn't properly check for getopt_long but found no solution. There may not be an answer, as I understand it the standard GNU C library has getopt_long() built in, so autogen m

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Carsten Klapp
Sorry I have no answer, I am wondering the same thing. I recently run in this situation with a new package I am testing and found that ./configure does not see the getopt_long function of libgnugetopt even though it is installed, even with various -I cflags and -L ldflags no success. For now

[Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Daniel Macks
I've noticed some program sources that make use of the GNU getopt library include that library source in their tarball, and then compile and static-link it into the binary (and some have a flag that controls whether to use it or expect that this library already exists in -L somewhere). Fink has a l