Re: [Fink-devel] GTK+ improvements

2002-01-31 Thread Finlay Dobbie
On Thursday, January 31, 2002, at 12:18 AM, Alexander Strange wrote: > I've made a new revision of gtk+, but being the maintainer would > require me to port GTK 1.3, and I don't want to do that (i don't think > that I know enough to do it). Why would it require you to do that? GTK+ 1.3 is uns

Re: [Fink-devel] GTK+ improvements

2002-01-30 Thread Ben Gertzfield
> "Alexander" == Alexander Strange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexander> I've made a new revision of gtk+, but being the Alexander> maintainer would require me to port GTK 1.3, and I Alexander> don't want to do that (i don't think that I know enough Alexander> to do it). Fin

[Fink-devel] GTK+ improvements

2002-01-30 Thread Alexander Strange
I've made a new revision of gtk+, but being the maintainer would require me to port GTK 1.3, and I don't want to do that (i don't think that I know enough to do it). Fingolfin suggested that I send the changes to the list, so here is the new .info file (since it's the same patch): Package: gtk