Kyle Moffett wrote:
On a side note, does anyone know if porting aptitude (from Debian) has
been attempted? I was considering trying such a port and was wondering
if anybody has made the attempt before and run into difficult or
unsolvable
problems.
I ported it a little while back, it's in
Kyle Moffett wrote:
You delete the line const char *_nl_expand_alias () without deleting
the extern and the #ifdef __cplusplus above it, which possibly makes
the gettext test fail.
Hm, yeah, I honestly don't understand how the crazy gettext checking
they're doing works, and what
On 27 Jul 2005, at 22:50, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Hm, yeah, I honestly don't understand how the crazy gettext
checking they're doing works, and what _nl_expand_alias is supposed
to do, but it's not in our gettext.
# nm -m /sw/lib/libintl.3.4.1.dylib|grep nl_expand_alias
(undefined
On Jul 27, 2005, at 16:50:15, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Kyle Moffett wrote:
Secondly, the configuration text redirection error comes from this
part
of the patch:
- user_config-Dump(out);
+ user_config-Dump();
I can't see any reason for this change. You don't even change the
argument list
On Jul 27, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
I ported it a little while back, it's in unstable. I'd be happy to
move it to stable if I get a few positive reports. (hint, hint) :)
Aptitude won't build for me on 10.4:
...
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
rm -fr output-html/
On Jul 25, 2005, at 19:22:06, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
* 'fink rescan' is deprecated because nobody knows what it's
for. If
you know, tell us!
I think I remember that it used to create/update apt-get package
lists for
local filesystem repositories, so that when running dselect you
On Jul 26, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:On Jul 25, 2005, at 19:22:06, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: * 'fink rescan' is deprecated because nobody knows what it's for. If you know, tell us! I think I remember that it used to create/update apt-get package lists forlocal filesystem
On Jul 26, 2005, at 19:52:44, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On Jul 26, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
I think I remember that it used to create/update apt-get package
lists for
local filesystem repositories, so that when running dselect you
can see
what deb files are on the local
On Jul 26, 2005, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
I think I remember that it used to create/update apt-get package
lists for
local filesystem repositories, so that when running dselect you can
see
what deb files are on the local filesystem, even if they aren't
installed
at the moment.
As
On Jul 26, 2005, at 23:04:04, Dave Vasilevsky wrote:
Personally I much prefer aptitude to deselect, even when not
using it to just install packages, because it allows one to mark
packages
as installed only due to dependency and it will automatically
remove them
when the depending package
Hey folks,
We're about to release fink 0.24.8. This is a bit of a bigger point-
release than usual, because a bunch of features from the future 0.25
have been backported, so we'd like to get a few days of testing on -
devel before release.
To try it out, you can access the branch
Dave == Dave Vasilevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave * 'fink rescan' is deprecated because nobody knows what it's
Dave for. If
Dave you know, tell us!
I've used it as a ritual turn east and pray action when I've gone in
and hacked my local .info and .patch files. Is it no longer
On Jul 25, 2005, at 7:33 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Dave * 'fink rescan' is deprecated because nobody knows what
it's
Dave for. If
Dave you know, tell us!
I've used it as a ritual turn east and pray action when I've gone in
and hacked my local .info and .patch files. Is it no
Dave == Dave Vasilevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave Usually fink should detect and update your index automagically. If
Dave for some reason it doesn't, the way to fix it is 'fink index'. As far
Dave as I can tell from the current code, 'fink rescan' will NOT fix this
Dave problem.
I might be
14 matches
Mail list logo
