On Saturday, April 6, 2002, at 12:43 PM, Max Horn wrote:
I don't think it's that silly. Think about it. There has been at least
one security hole in OS X (in NetInfo) in the past that could only be
exploited by local users to gain root. On my box, that's only me, so
almost no risk. On
David R. Morrison wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
- agqt-0.9.1-1
- ispell-french-1.0-1
- ispell-german-20011124-1
(ispell-italian is broken ATM, because the upstream maintainer is moving
to a new URL and the source is no longer available on the net. I had
positive reports about
Martin Costabel wrote:
I have had positive user reports about the following packages which I
maintain and which are in unstable. I think they could be moved to
stable i nobody objects.
- agqt-0.9.1-1
- ispell-french-1.0-1
- ispell-german-20011124-1
(ispell-italian is broken ATM, because
At 17:21 Uhr -0800 05.04.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
At 7:11 PM +0100 4/5/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
For those of you who missed fully reading and comprehending Max's
message, building the binary distribution on the OS X Compiler Farm
is too much of a security risk, which is why I made my suggestion.
Max Horn wrote:
1) Stable-Move-Phase
We try to get as many package to stable. This way we can ensure a big
binary distro, plus stable users have more current stuff. Of course,
we still must be careful doing so, it's no use to have packages in
stable that don't work properly. So don't rush!
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
OTOH, I have no feedback (except that they compile) on the packages
- siag (a complete, small, office suite)
I've just opened up the spreadsheet. Seems to work ok, but then I'm not
pushing it in any significant way. Ahh ok, the other components are
On Friday, April 5, 2002, at 02:37 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
We do have a Fink buildserver, for those who missed Max's message - Max
is now the admin of Sourceforge OSX Compile Farm. Dual 800s. Rooted.
For those of you who missed fully reading and comprehending Max's
message, building the
At 7:11 PM +0100 4/5/02, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
For those of you who missed fully reading and comprehending Max's
message, building the binary distribution on the OS X Compiler Farm
is too much of a security risk, which is why I made my suggestion.
Yep. I reread the message and noticed that,
On 4/4/02 10:32 PM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 13:34 Uhr +0200 03.04.2002, Max Horn wrote:
[...]
I propose our next release be on Saturday, 13th April. (This gives
us enough time to follow the procedure outlined below; also it means
that in case of screw up, I have the sunday
[I planed to send this over one week ago, but many things got in my way, sorry]
I think we should make a 0.4.0 distro release pretty soon. To prevent
problems like last time, I'd like to have the release process
formalized more than it is (which is not at all). I believe this will
benefit us
10 matches
Mail list logo
