Oops, I didn't noticed gdk-pixbuf breakage caused by gtk-doc.
I added --desable-gtk-doc to both gdk-pixbuf and gdk-pixbuf-shlib.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 18:36:48 +0100
Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori hasn't
>
On lundi, février 25, 2002, at 05:30 , Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori hasn't
> noticed yet...
Bingo! I removed gtk-doc, and the rebuild of gdk-pixbuf completed
without a hitch. So there should probably be some --disable-gtk-doc
opti
Hi,
Your problems may be a conflict with gtk-doc which Masanori
hasn't noticed yet...
I am sure he'll fix it as and when he gets the time. It is,
after all the unstable tree we are talking about here :)
Am copying him.
Peter
On Tuesday, February 26, 2002, at 12:53 AM, Martin Costabel wrote
On lundi, février 25, 2002, at 01:40 , Max Horn wrote:
>
> So i strongly doubt that the system update is the culprit. Rather
> something else that has been changed recently.
>
> Matthias, since when exactly do you have these problems?
My problems are different, but also persistent. I compiled
gd
At 1:37 Uhr +0100 25.02.2002, Jorge Acereda Maci· wrote:
>"David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> installed by the 10.1.3 upgrade. I don't know how to check the version
> > number of sh or zsh, which Matthias said was 3.0.8 in his case.
I am running 10.1.3, I have zlib 3.0.8, but gd
On Sunday, February 24, 2002, at 04:28 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
> I have separate binaries for /bin/sh and /bin/zsh, although they are
> identical in size (449616) and date (Dec 31). Presumably they were
> installed by the 10.1.3 upgrade.
Sizes are the same here. I'm running 10.1.2
Matthi
"David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> installed by the 10.1.3 upgrade. I don't know how to check the version
> number of sh or zsh, which Matthias said was 3.0.8 in his case.
This should work:
zsh -c 'echo $ZSH_VERSION'
___
Fink-devel mai
I have separate binaries for /bin/sh and /bin/zsh, although they are
identical in size (449616) and date (Dec 31). Presumably they were
installed by the 10.1.3 upgrade. I don't know how to check the version
number of sh or zsh, which Matthias said was 3.0.8 in his case.
-- Dave
_
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> This sounds like an interesting enigma, please let us know if
> you find the cause. I wonder if fink could somehow run in a
> 'clean' shell.
Did you upgrade to 10.1.3?
--
Martin
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
Matthias Neeracher wrote:
>
> Trying to update my unstable packages at home, I run into problems with
> gdk-pixbuf-shlibs-0.16.0-2 and gdk-pixbuf-0.16.0-3. Both of these
> packages complained about not being able to find library `' (Yes, that's
> an empty string).
> I traced the build and found t
Hi, I don't have any problems with gdk-pixbuf, which is strange,
because my /bin/sh is zsh too (Apple supplied hard link to
/bin/zsh). Makes me wonder if you have some env vars set which
may affect things or something else to do with your setup. It is
odd that you and I get different results o
Trying to update my unstable packages at home, I run into problems with
gdk-pixbuf-shlibs-0.16.0-2 and gdk-pixbuf-0.16.0-3. Both of these
packages complained about not being able to find library `' (Yes, that's
an empty string).
I traced the build and found the following:
- libtool is run by
12 matches
Mail list logo
