Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [ fink-Package Submissions-928157 ] ca-roots, list of SSL CA root certificates

2004-05-04 Thread AIDA Shinra
Hmm. The root certificates are IMHO, facts. There's only one set of root certificates-- or at least there should be, else the whole system of trust chains would fall apart. I.e Debian gets a certificate from a organization which certifies that the holders of the Debian private key is

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [ fink-Package Submissions-928157 ] ca-roots, list of SSL CA root certificates

2004-05-04 Thread David R. Morrison
Is it acceptable to delete License: field simply? No. Every fink package must have a license field. See: http://fink.sourceforge.net/doc/packaging/policy.php?phpLang=en#licenses -- Dave --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle

[Fink-devel] Re: [ fink-Package Submissions-928157 ] ca-roots, list of SSL CA root certificates

2004-05-01 Thread AIDA Shinra
I submitted a new package ca-roots at the Tracker before. The problem is what license is appropreate. The CA certificates came from mod_ssl distribution, which is Apache licensed. But modssl.org originally got them from Netscape Communicator/Navigator. I filled BSD in License field, but I might

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [ fink-Package Submissions-928157 ] ca-roots, list of SSL CA root certificates

2004-05-01 Thread Jeremy Erwin
On May 1, 2004, at 3:09 PM, AIDA Shinra wrote: I submitted a new package ca-roots at the Tracker before. The problem is what license is appropreate. The CA certificates came from mod_ssl distribution, which is Apache licensed. But modssl.org originally got them from Netscape