"David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to clarify the situation a bit more:
>
> If the software you are packaging makes use of the Fink package foo
> whenever foo is present, and if you have no way to disable it from making
> use of foo, then you must list foo as a dependency.
Yes
Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> And additionally, this isnt just an arbitrary goal, your package will
> break for source users too:
>
> 1. User installs dlcompat.
> 2. User installs (from source) your package, which finds and uses
> dlcompat
> 3. User removes dlcompat (this works be
At 19:02 Uhr +0100 12.01.2003, Michel Schinz wrote:
Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Well, the real problem is your fault, you missed a dependency when
making the package, and we missed it when verifying. :)
Well, I do not view it that way, of course :-).
Scsh does *not* depend
