[Fink-devel] Re: Safety

2003-02-03 Thread Ashley Yakeley
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How to do the validation? Ask the user about each file outside of /sw? > For all 7790 of them in the case of xfree86? Or do it automatically by > including a list of all files in the package description, as RPM or > d

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Safety

2003-02-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Jeremy Erwin wrote: On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 10:48 PM, Ashley Yakeley wrote: [] I really see this as a simple sanity check on the dpkg. There are very few packages that install outside of %p and no other package info files need be affected. jeremy@callisto:/sw/fink/dists/unstable/m

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Safety

2003-02-01 Thread Jeremy Erwin
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 10:48 PM, Ashley Yakeley wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2. After the dpkg is built, fink should check it to make sure that all the files are within %p (or within other directories somehow explicitly me

[Fink-devel] Re: Safety

2003-02-01 Thread Ashley Yakeley
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Corrin Lakeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, running fink without root really isn't that hard. Yeah, I wrote a FAQ about that over a year ago. Of course you have an updated hack. Begin Forwarded Message Date:200

[Fink-devel] Re: Safety

2003-02-01 Thread Ashley Yakeley
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. Have fink build as non-root. However, to do this properly I think > > this requires the use of fakeroot. If anyone wants to port fakeroot, > > they'd be doing the fink community an enormous favour. > > Probably,