Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: [] Testing, however, finds that fink does the Right Thing here. Objection withdrawn. So why do you *ever* do '-x xfontconfig' in your *Script? I think there is quite a bit of, let's say, "legacy code" (AKA old cruft) in these font packages. I can only speak for the msttcorefont

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-23 Thread David R. Morrison
Dan, Just to clarify this further, fink generally executes things in the sequence fink build foo dpkg -i foo fink build bar dpkg -i bar The only exception is when bar is a splitoff of foo; then fink is supposed to fink build foo dpkg -i foo bar -- Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-23 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:29:16AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > On 23 janv. 2004, at 07:38, Daniel Macks wrote: > > > >I see you have a Depends:xfontpath, but I don't know if fink and dpkg > >have a deterministic order when installing multiple packages at once. > >Maybe you should first do a -x

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-23 Thread Martin Costabel
On 23 janv. 2004, at 07:38, Daniel Macks wrote: [] Why do you only sometimes do a -x test for xfontpath before calling it? If it's not present but XftXConfig is, this script will crash. I don't know much about xfontpath, but it appears that its presence affects the installation footprint of gimp-fr

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-22 Thread Daniel Macks
Alexander Strange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 > Added Files: > gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info > > --- NEW FILE: gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info --- > Package: gimp-freefonts > Version: 0.10 > Revision: 2 > Depe

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Strange wrote: On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:54 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: install -d -m 755 %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont install -c -m 644 * %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont I don't think this is legal.. it will make diff

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-22 Thread Alexander Strange
On Jan 22, 2004, at 10:54 PM, Ben Hines wrote: On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: install -d -m 755 %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont install -c -m 644 * %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont I don't think this is legal.. it will make different .debs for

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11 gimp-freefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1 gimp-sharefonts-0.10-2.info,NONE,1.1

2004-01-22 Thread Ben Hines
On Jan 21, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Alexander Strange wrote: install -d -m 755 %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont install -c -m 644 * %d`%p/bin/xfontpath basedir`/freefont I don't think this is legal.. it will make different .debs for different people. It'll be luck of the draw to