Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread Ben Hines
On May 8, 2004, at 9:21 AM, jfm wrote: turned up only pari-gp (the executable)_ and that's no problem, since otool shows gp links only with ncurses. This must already cover a fair number of your 70 pkgs ... So there is no problem then. We can update the 3 packages which have the problem. -Ben

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread jfm
On May 8, 2004, at 4:57 PM, jfm wrote: The 2 cases were from a local program, that linked both readline and ncurses _ in this order. Clearly the order is important for the trouble _ but you need also that one of the object files does reference one of those 3 symbols... A quick sampling (yes _ th

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-08 Thread jfm
On May 8, 2004, at 3:06 AM, Ben Hines wrote: On May 7, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Ben Hines wrote: That did not happen to me. Perhaps it will only occur with programs which do not use ncurses, but which do use readline? Which programs ? The 2 cases were from a local program, that linked both readline and

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-07 Thread Ben Hines
On May 7, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Ben Hines wrote: That did not happen to me. Perhaps it will only occur with programs which do not use ncurses, but which do use readline? Which programs ? Also, at this point we might as well start adding versioned deps on the latest readline on anything this effect

[Fink-devel] Re: readline-4.3-26

2004-05-07 Thread Ben Hines
On May 7, 2004, at 9:38 AM, jfm wrote: Hi, Today's update was motivated by : > Put an end to: > warning multiple definitions of symbol _BC /sw/lib/libreadline.dylib(terminal.so) > definition of _BC But since then I got with several programs : # Singular dyld: Singular Undefined symbols: Sing