Could the info file for autoconf2.5 in 10.3 unstable be put in 10.3 stable, so that they would be exactly the same?
At the moment the checksum are different due to a -f option to rm lines:
in unstable:
rm -f %i/share/emacs/site-lisp/autoconf-mode.elc
rm -f %i/share/emacs/site-lisp/autotest-mode.
On Friday, Jan 17, 2003, at 21:09 Europe/Brussels, Kow K wrote:
In my case, it worked out when I updated autoconf2.5 after updating
automake, without using "fink update-all".
That should be correct, but stuphead and gbiff (still in 10.1..)
"Depend" on automake...
So same problem for automake,
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 04:26 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 11:55 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
- Provides: autoconf25-2.54 doesn't look right. Shouldn't this be
just autoconf25. Or is there now a versioning mechanism for virtual
packages? In any case, I am unable
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 11:55 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
- Provides: autoconf25-2.54 doesn't look right. Shouldn't this be just
autoconf25. Or is there now a versioning mechanism for virtual
packages? In any case, I am unable to remove the dummy
autoconf25-2.54-2, because then nothin
In my case, it worked out when I updated autoconf2.5 after updating
automake, without using "fink update-all".
Kow
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 11:55 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
There are problems with the new autoconf2.5:
- automatic updating doesn't work, autoconf25 has to be force-removed
There are problems with the new autoconf2.5:
- automatic updating doesn't work, autoconf25 has to be force-removed first.
- Provides: autoconf25-2.54 doesn't look right. Shouldn't this be just
autoconf25. Or is there now a versioning mechanism for virtual packages?
In any case, I am unable to r
