Hi,
On 27.03.2015, at 03:26, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing the following failure in the automake1.15-1.15-1
> InfoTest run during 'fink -m' on x86_64-apple-darwin12?
Not me (otherwise, I wouldn't have committed it). This is on 12.6.0, i.e. OS X
10.8.5.
To verify, I just re-run t
Is anyone else seeing the following failure in the automake1.15-1.15-1
InfoTest run during 'fink -m' on x86_64-apple-darwin12?
tap-planskip-badexit: hard error: failed to remake Makefile.in
ERROR: t/tap-planskip-badexit.sh
This is with fink's make 4.1-1 installed.
---
On 3/18/2015 10:07 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> The new automake1.15-1.15-1 packaging is failing 'fink -m' on
> x86_64-apple-darwin14...
>
> FAIL: t/fort4.sh
>
> which was previously reported upstream without any response from the
> developers.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2015-
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> On 18.03.2015, at 21:18, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
>> Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or
>> BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that
>> test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a succe
On 18.03.2015, at 21:18, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or
> BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that
> test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a successful 'fink
> -m' was done on an automake### package?
We
Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or
BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that
test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a successful 'fink
-m' was done on an automake### package? I tried removing fink gawk,
make and bash. None of those h
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:44:08 -0700, Alexander Hansen
wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > > I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be
> > to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure
> > isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 re
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be
> to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure
> isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 release.
>
For _test_ purposes, one could also grab the prior dej
I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be
to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure
isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 release.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:07:33 -0400, Jack Howarth
> wrote:
>
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:07:33 -0400, Jack Howarth
wrote:
The new automake1.15-1.15-1 packaging is failing 'fink -m' on
> x86_64-apple-darwin14...
>
> FAIL: t/fort4.sh
>
> which was previously reported upstream without any response from the
> developers.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug
The new automake1.15-1.15-1 packaging is failing 'fink -m' on
x86_64-apple-darwin14...
FAIL: t/fort4.sh
which was previously reported upstream without any response from the developers.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2015-02/msg0.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-auto
11 matches
Mail list logo