Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1 InfoTest failure

2015-04-08 Thread Max Horn
Hi, On 27.03.2015, at 03:26, Jack Howarth wrote: > Is anyone else seeing the following failure in the automake1.15-1.15-1 > InfoTest run during 'fink -m' on x86_64-apple-darwin12? Not me (otherwise, I wouldn't have committed it). This is on 12.6.0, i.e. OS X 10.8.5. To verify, I just re-run t

[Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1 InfoTest failure

2015-03-26 Thread Jack Howarth
Is anyone else seeing the following failure in the automake1.15-1.15-1 InfoTest run during 'fink -m' on x86_64-apple-darwin12? tap-planskip-badexit: hard error: failed to remake Makefile.in ERROR: t/tap-planskip-badexit.sh This is with fink's make 4.1-1 installed. ---

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On 3/18/2015 10:07 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > The new automake1.15-1.15-1 packaging is failing 'fink -m' on > x86_64-apple-darwin14... > > FAIL: t/fort4.sh > > which was previously reported upstream without any response from the > developers. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2015-

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Max Horn wrote: > > On 18.03.2015, at 21:18, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or >> BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that >> test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a succe

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Max Horn
On 18.03.2015, at 21:18, Jack Howarth wrote: > Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or > BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that > test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a successful 'fink > -m' was done on an automake### package? We

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Jack Howarth
Note though that we have never had an explicit TestDepends or BuildDepends on gcc4x to insure that gfortran is present when that test is run. Do we have any idea when the last time a successful 'fink -m' was done on an automake### package? I tried removing fink gawk, make and bash. None of those h

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:44:08 -0700, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be > > to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure > > isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 re

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Alexander Hansen
> On Mar 18, 2015, at 8:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be > to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure > isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 release. > For _test_ purposes, one could also grab the prior dej

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Jack Howarth
I can't test this until later today, but one possibility would be to try Epoch'ing dejagnu back to 1.5.1 to make sure that the failure isn't coming from the newer 1.5.2 release. On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:07:33 -0400, Jack Howarth > wrote: >

Re: [Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Daniel Macks
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:07:33 -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: The new automake1.15-1.15-1 packaging is failing 'fink -m' on > x86_64-apple-darwin14... > > FAIL: t/fort4.sh > > which was previously reported upstream without any response from the > developers. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug

[Fink-devel] automake1.15-1.15-1

2015-03-18 Thread Jack Howarth
The new automake1.15-1.15-1 packaging is failing 'fink -m' on x86_64-apple-darwin14... FAIL: t/fort4.sh which was previously reported upstream without any response from the developers. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2015-02/msg0.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-auto