On 21 Apr 2010, at 00:16, Pepe Barbe wrote:
> Sorry for the delay replying. Currently, I am very short on time and
> I have not been actively maintaining binutils, whatever little time
> I have focused on other packages that I use and still so I had
> trouble to honor a few requests I had r
Pepe and Karl-Michael,
The current situation with binutils on x86_64
isn't very logical. We should attempt to synchronize
the binutils and x86-64-binutils packages on the
latest release (2.20.1) and then remove x86_64
from the Architecture field in x86-64-binutils.info.
It doesn't make much sen
