On 20/11/11 20:23, Max Horn wrote:
> But I now see that you still maintain boost1.3* packages. Hum, so do you two
> coordinate somehow or what?
In so far as the packages should be aware of each other and conflict
gracefully. But the boost*cmake and the traditional boost (-bjam)
projects are suf
Am 20.11.2011 um 19:36 schrieb Martin Costabel:
> On 20/11/11 14:42, Max Horn wrote:
>>
>> Am 20.11.2011 um 01:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Does anybody have any objections to my adding the boost1.46.1.cmake
>>> package from
>>>
On 11/20/11 1:36 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 20/11/11 14:42, Max Horn wrote:
>> Am 20.11.2011 um 01:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Does anybody have any objections to my adding the boost1.46.1.cmake
>>> package from
>>>
>>> https://
On 20/11/11 14:42, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 20.11.2011 um 01:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Does anybody have any objections to my adding the boost1.46.1.cmake
>> package from
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=
Am 20.11.2011 um 01:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does anybody have any objections to my adding the boost1.46.1.cmake
> package from
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=3436035&group_id=17203
>
> ? Provided that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anybody have any objections to my adding the boost1.46.1.cmake
package from
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=414256&aid=3436035&group_id=17203
? Provided that I update the Conflicts/Replaces in the other boosts
of course.
- --
