Re: [Fink-devel] botched downloads

2004-06-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "David" == David R Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> An update: SourceForge has now responded, and is fixing the problem. David> -- Dave Yes, I now have new fink! -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.st

Re: [Fink-devel] botched downloads

2004-06-16 Thread David R. Morrison
An update: SourceForge has now responded, and is fixing the problem. -- Dave --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - Jul

Re: [Fink-devel] botched downloads

2004-06-16 Thread David R. Morrison
The Master Mirror is not an option for a brand new file like the new fink release. We had this same trouble last week when fink 0.20.3 was released. It was reported to SourceForge. There has been no response to the report. Once the Master Mirror picks the file up, it should be easy for users to

Re: [Fink-devel] botched downloads

2004-06-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
Sounds like one of SourceForge's mirrors is broken. Setting a different mirror option (e.g. using a Master Mirror) should do the trick. On Jun 16, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: When I tried a fink rsync update this morning, for the file /sw/src/fink-0.20.4.tar.gz, I got a big chu

[Fink-devel] botched downloads

2004-06-16 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
When I tried a fink rsync update this morning, for the file /sw/src/fink-0.20.4.tar.gz, I got a big chunk of HTML, looking like the sourceforge "select a download site" page. That's clearly not a .tar.gz file. What's broken, and do I need to do anything about it, or is this someone else's (urgen