Re: [Fink-devel] cvs2cl package

2004-12-16 Thread Lars Rosengreen
On Dec 16, 2004, at 10:43 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:31 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote: I recently tried to build the cvs2cl package, and it looks like the md5 sum for the upstream source has changed. cvs2cl doesn't currently have anyone listed as a ma

Re: [Fink-devel] cvs2cl package

2004-12-16 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:31 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote: I recently tried to build the cvs2cl package, and it looks like the md5 sum for the upstream source has changed. cvs2cl doesn't currently have anyone listed as a maintainer. Does that mean that it is ``ok'' for me t

Re: [Fink-devel] cvs2cl package

2004-12-16 Thread Lars Rosengreen
On Dec 16, 2004, at 7:00 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: It sounds fine to me. Ok, I fixed it. I also updated the version in stable, which was more than three years old. The new .info file should probably also go into 10.2-gcc3.3, but I don't have a 10.2 system to test on. -Lars --

Re: [Fink-devel] cvs2cl package

2004-12-16 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On Dec 16, 2004, at 9:31 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote: I recently tried to build the cvs2cl package, and it looks like the md5 sum for the upstream source has changed. cvs2cl doesn't currently have anyone listed as a maintainer. Does that mean that it is ``ok'' for me to just go ahead and commit

[Fink-devel] cvs2cl package

2004-12-16 Thread Lars Rosengreen
I recently tried to build the cvs2cl package, and it looks like the md5 sum for the upstream source has changed. cvs2cl doesn't currently have anyone listed as a maintainer. Does that mean that it is ``ok'' for me to just go ahead and commit a fix ? -Lars