Am 19.11.2011 um 21:21 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
[...]
> Here's a couple of test finks, derived from branch_0_31:
>
> https://github.com/akhansen/fink/zipball/clang-default
> https://github.com/akhansen/fink/zipball/llvm-default
>
> Hopefully the names are self-explanatory. :-)
>
> The clang-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/11 5:59 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 16.11.2011 um 17:56 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>
>> Right, and the point I was trying to make is that fink-0.31.4
>> *doesn't work* for people who do a fresh install of Xcode 4.2,
>> beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/11 5:59 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 16.11.2011 um 17:56 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>
>> Right, and the point I was trying to make is that fink-0.31.4
>> *doesn't work* for people who do a fresh install of Xcode 4.2,
>> beca
On 11/17/11 10:09 AM, David Lowe wrote:
> On 16 Nov, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>
>> But on the other hand, this also means that Xcode 4.2 on 10.6 now contains
>> no reliable compiler at all :-(.
>
> I guess we can't simply declare this particular combination to be
> unsupported?
>
On 16 Nov, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> But on the other hand, this also means that Xcode 4.2 on 10.6 now contains no
> reliable compiler at all :-(.
I guess we can't simply declare this particular combination to be
unsupported?
Sent from my MacBookPro
Friends come and friends
Am 16.11.2011 um 17:56 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
[...]
>>
>
> Right, and the point I was trying to make is that fink-0.31.4 *doesn't
> work* for people who do a fresh install of Xcode 4.2, because of the
> absence of gcc-4.2 in the PATH. Bootstrap immediately fails, as per
>
> http://pastebi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/11 10:52 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 10/21/11 6:09 PM, Max Horn wrote:
>> Jack,
>
>> Am 21.10.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Martin Costabel
>>> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
Is the poss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/11 6:09 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Am 21.10.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Jack Howarth:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Is the possible benefit for a tiny minority of xcode-4.2 users
>>> o
So personally, I'd love to avoid that and get things compatible
with XCode 4.2 by making sure everything gets to use GCC 4.2 by
default.
Cheers, Max
>
> Did we actually _confirm_ that Xcode 4.2 comes with gcc-4.2 on 10.6?
> We've got a user in IRC today who doesn't
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:52:41AM -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/21/11 6:09 PM, Max Horn wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > Am 21.10.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Jack Howarth:
> >
> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
In view of the comments so far, the path of least resistance for fixing fink
to
use SL Xcode 4.2 obviously appears to be reverting the system compiler under
fink to gcc-4.2
and g++-4.2 for cc/gcc and c++/g++ respectively. The simple approach would be
to enhance
the compiler wrapper for path-p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/11 3:44 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:02:56PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>> On 21/10/11 16:04 , Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel
>>> wrote:
On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack
Jack,
Am 21.10.2011 um 21:53 schrieb Jack Howarth:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
[...]
>> Is the possible benefit for a tiny minority of xcode-4.2 users on Snow
>> Leopard really worth all this hassle?
>
> Considering that i386 fink represents the most te
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 21/10/11 21:18 , Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> On 10/21/11 3:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> []
>>> What I mean is that a package that does not compile under clang
>>> needs to include the above fix for xcode-4.2 if your automatic
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:02:56PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 21/10/11 16:04 , Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>> On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> []
should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would
On 21/10/11 21:18 , Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 10/21/11 3:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
>> What I mean is that a package that does not compile under clang
>> needs to include the above fix for xcode-4.2 if your automatic
>> switch to clang is implemented. But then it will probably no longer
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/11 3:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 21/10/11 16:04 , Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>> On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote: []
should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xc
On 21/10/11 16:04 , Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
>> On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> []
>>> should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would allow
>>> us to
>>> focus on supporting clang in the Xcode 4.x releas
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote:
> []
>> should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would allow
>> us to
>> focus on supporting clang in the Xcode 4.x releases and encourage
>> unification of
>> any clan
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote:
> []
>> should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would allow
>> us to
>> focus on supporting clang in the Xcode 4.x releases and encourage
>> unification of
>> any clan
On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote:
[]
> should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would allow
> us to
> focus on supporting clang in the Xcode 4.x releases and encourage unification
> of
> any clang specific changes to info files between the 10.4 and 10.6 trees. It
> al
The ppl9.info file provides a good example of the adjustments we need to
make to info files in order to support path-prefix-clang under Xcode 4.2 on
SL...
--- /sw/fink/10.6/stable/main/finkinfo/devel/ppl9.info 2011-09-26
09:48:21.0 -0400
+++ ppl9.info 2011-10-20 18:44:37.0
The release of Xcode 4.2 for Snow Leopard presents fink with both a problem
and an opportunity. The Xcode 4.2 SL release defaults /usr/bin/gcc and
/usr/bin/g++
to the llvm-gcc-4.2 and llvm-g++-4.2 compilers respectively. This exposes fink
10.6
to a slew of llvm-gcc bugs (many yet unknown). For
23 matches
Mail list logo
