At Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:35:22 +0100,
Jean-François Mertens wrote:
On 06 Jan 2008, at 23:21, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
Is there any particular reason why the symlinks couldn't/shouldn't be
installed by textutils?
And by coreutils itself for the commands where
there is no corresponding
I note that fink's textutils package depends on coreutils-default. I
am not convinced that this is a good thing, as it seems that some of
the programs in the coreutils package may cause problems if they
replace the basic programs installed with OS X. But, I need sha1sum,
which is part of
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:43:12AM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
I note that fink's textutils package depends on coreutils-default. I
am not convinced that this is a good thing, as it seems that some of
the programs in the coreutils package may cause problems if they
replace the basic
On 6-Jan-08, at 11:55 , Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:43:12AM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
I note that fink's textutils package depends on coreutils-default. I
am not convinced that this is a good thing, as it seems that some of
the programs in the coreutils package may cause
On 6-Jan-08, at 12:22 , Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
Kevin Horton wrote:
On 6-Jan-08, at 11:55 , Daniel Macks wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:43:12AM -0500, Kevin Horton wrote:
I note that fink's textutils package depends on coreutils-
default. I
am not convinced that this is a good
Kevin Horton wrote:
The light bulb just went on here, helped by a study of a coreutils
build log. Coreutils does provide gsha1sum. I was looking for
sha1sum, but that symlink is only in coreutils-default. I'll create
my own symlink in ~/bin, which should satisfy the program looking
On 06 Jan 2008, at 23:21, Robert T Wyatt wrote:
Is there any particular reason why the symlinks couldn't/shouldn't be
installed by textutils?
And by coreutils itself for the commands where
there is no corresponding system command ?
JF Mertens
