On 11/22/06, Michèle Garoche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warnings emitted:
/usr/bin/ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol
_dbus_g_type_specialized_construct
./.libs/libdbus-gtool.a(dbus-gtype-specialized.o) definition of
_dbus_g_type_specialized_construct in section
(__TEXT,__text)
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 06:53:09AM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote:
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like to move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
There was something broken with Depends not getting applied at
compile-time. See Max's changes on 2004-01-06.
dan
--
Sure, we can wait.
If there are bugs in 0.18.0 which need to be addressed, then we should fix
them both in CVS HEAD, and in branch_0_18, and plan to release 0.18.1
which addresses them. Then, after 0.18.1 has been tested for a while,
we can move it to stable and only then release 0.19.0.
--
I'm happy to release 0.18.1 with this bugfix. Any other bugs that we need
to squash in the same release?
-- Dave
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like to move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
-- Dave
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the
On 03.02.2004, at 12:53, David R. Morrison wrote:
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like to
move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
Mostly good. The only strange thing i discovered:
If i type in 'fink install apache2' i get:
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Christian Schaffner wrote:
On 03.02.2004, at 12:53, David R. Morrison wrote:
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like to
move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
Mostly good. The only strange thing i discovered:
If i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David R. Morrison wrote:
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like to move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
I am still not so sure that the mirror setup works properly. I am not
sure, because I am getting different
On 03.02.2004, at 14:39, Darian Lanx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Christian Schaffner wrote:
On 03.02.2004, at 12:53, David R. Morrison wrote:
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like
to move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
Mostly good.
On 3 févr. 2004, at 12:53, David R. Morrison wrote:
Anybody have good or bad things to say about fink 0.18.0? I'd like to
move
it to stable, and release 0.19.0.
There is also the affair of atk1 which is considered as buildonly:
WARNING: The package zenity Depends on atk1,
but atk1
Martin Costabel wrote:
More precisely: In the file atk1.info in 10.3/unstable, which is version
1.4.1-3 and which I have installed, there is no such field. In
10.3/stable in version 1.4.1-2, there is such a field. The fact that
this is taken into account looks like a bug.
I have to agree, we do
Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Costabel wrote:
More precisely: In the file atk1.info in 10.3/unstable, which is version
1.4.1-3 and which I have installed, there is no such field. In
10.3/stable in version 1.4.1-2, there is such a field. The fact that
this is taken
12 matches
Mail list logo
