Re: [Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

2009-07-19 Thread Remi Mommsen
Hi Bill, On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:17 AM, William G. Scott wrote: Hi Citizens: A number of packages, including fftw, depend on gcc43 instead of gcc44, which leads to the rather time-consuming and blood-pressure- elevating phenomenon of having not one but two interminable builds for packages that

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

2009-07-19 Thread Jack Howarth
Sebastien Maret just checked in the fftw and fftw3 packaging to build against gcc44. If anyone has a package building against those which depends on gcc43, they can now switch over to gcc44. Jack -- Enter the

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

2009-07-17 Thread Alexander Hansen
William G. Scott wrote: Hi Citizens: A number of packages, including fftw, depend on gcc43 instead of gcc44, which leads to the rather time-consuming and blood-pressure- elevating phenomenon of having not one but two interminable builds for packages that depend on fftw and gcc44. Any

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

2009-07-17 Thread Kevin Horton
On 17-Jul-09, at 01:17 , William G. Scott wrote: Hi Citizens: A number of packages, including fftw, depend on gcc43 instead of gcc44, which leads to the rather time-consuming and blood-pressure- elevating phenomenon of having not one but two interminable builds for packages that depend on

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

2009-07-17 Thread Jack Howarth
We need to convert over to gcc44 in any case so that all of the packages can build on x86_64 fink. The only problem child will be pdftk which is still stuck on gcc42 because of its broken coding (which mixes java and c++ exceptions that is now forbidden in gcc 4.3 and later). Jack

[Fink-devel] gcc43 vs. gcc44

2009-07-16 Thread William G. Scott
Hi Citizens: A number of packages, including fftw, depend on gcc43 instead of gcc44, which leads to the rather time-consuming and blood-pressure- elevating phenomenon of having not one but two interminable builds for packages that depend on fftw and gcc44. Any chance this can be remedied?