Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-25 Thread TheSin
I totally agree with this, the pkg maintainers should be making sure the -L/sw/lib and bogus deps don't make the .la files, fixing pilot-link9 wasn't an easy task because of this, I had to disable iconv support. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-25 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Costabel wrote: | Ben Hines wrote: | |> |> On Dec 22, 2003, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: |> |>> Solutions: Either one allows gettext-dev to Depend on libiconv-dev |>> (but this not only violates policy but may also break bootstrapping, |>>

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Ben Hines wrote: On Dec 22, 2003, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Solutions: Either one allows gettext-dev to Depend on libiconv-dev (but this not only violates policy but may also break bootstrapping, because gettext-dev might be needed before libiconv is built), or all packages that are s

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Ben Hines wrote: On Dec 22, 2003, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: by this problem (and this is hard to detect and concerns potentially many packages) would need a BuildDepends on both gettext-dev and libiconv-dev. Yes, that is the answer. Any packages which don't should be fixed. Feel free

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-24 Thread Ben Hines
On Dec 22, 2003, at 4:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Solutions: Either one allows gettext-dev to Depend on libiconv-dev (but this not only violates policy but may also break bootstrapping, because gettext-dev might be needed before libiconv is built), or all packages that are susceptible to be h

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-22 Thread TheSin
if they break without them, I'd say they need them. Builddepends and Depends aren't always easy to see but it doesn't mean they aren't needed. If an app doesn't behave properly with a depends/builddepends I'd say it's needed. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
TheSin wrote: all packages that need them should have Depends: libiconv, gettext BuildDepends: libiconv-dev, gettext-dev I do it all the time in my pkgs. Sure. The problem are packages like irssi that don't need them, but still break when gettext-dev is there and libiconv-dev isn't. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-22 Thread TheSin
all packages that need them should have Depends: libiconv, gettext BuildDepends: libiconv-dev, gettext-dev I do it all the time in my pkgs. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 22-Dec-03, at 5:50 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Solutions: Either

[Fink-devel] gettext-dev and libiconv-dev dpendencies

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Costabel
Several packages do not compile when only gettext-dev is installed but not libiconv-dev. They compile OK when either both of them are installed or none of them. One example I have seen is irssi, another one is libiconv, and I am pretty sure there are others. Standard configure scripts check fo