-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David R. Morrison wrote:
The other option I thought of was to continue keeping the gettext
executables in a package called gettext-bin, which would now become
a splitoff of gettext2 and get a later version number. The newer
versions of gettext-bin
Hi Max. I need your help in figuring out the correct strategy for upgrading
gettext.
There are two issues, which I will keep separate so as not to confuse things.
As I've mentioned before, the major version number in libintl.dylib has
changed in recent versions of gettext, so we need a new
I doubt that we can use update-alternatives in gettext. The problem is,
the update-alternatives binary is provided by dpkg, but dpkg depends
on gettext and so gettext gets built earlier in the bootstrap...
-- Dave
---
This SF.Net email
Hi Max.
1) You are quite right, the man pages belong in -dev. I'll move them.
2) Yes, gettext-runtime and gettext-tools can be compiled completely
separately, although they use the same source (and gettext-runtime has
to be done first because gettext-tools links to the libs in the other
Am Mittwoch, 06.08.03 um 18:21 Uhr schrieb David R. Morrison:
Hi Max. I need your help in figuring out the correct strategy for
upgrading
gettext.
There are two issues, which I will keep separate so as not to confuse
things.
As I've mentioned before, the major version number in libintl.dylib
