Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-27 Thread Jack Howarth
JF, I've posted revised packaging for mesa-libglw which converts it into using variants for -lesstif, -openmotif3 and -openmotif4. The packages build libGLw with differing library basenames and use a libGLw symlink in the base (development) package for compiling against these libraries. I sti

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Apr 2008, at 22:49, Jack Howarth wrote: > JF, >Don't forget that I had to manually add the -lXm to the link > flags in the original mesa-libglw patch. I would argue that the > approach to leave the these symbols undefined and suppress > the error is more convention. The fedora developer

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jack Howarth
JF, Don't forget that I had to manually add the -lXm to the link flags in the original mesa-libglw patch. I would argue that the approach to leave the these symbols undefined and suppress the error is more convention. The fedora developers don't link libGLw against a specific motif and their lib

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Apr 2008, at 20:29, Martin Costabel wrote: > Jean-François Mertens wrote: > [] >> I see the following diff : >> >> ... > Why should these symbols be picked up if -lXm is not on the linker > line > and Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup is present? Sorry, had forgotten to diff the patch file t

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] > I see the following diff : > > 7c7 > < Depends: x11, openmotif3-shlibs, %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) > --- > > Depends: x11, %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) > 12c12 > < make OPT_FLAGS="-O3 -I%p/include" LIB_DIR=lib darwin > --- > > make OPT_FLAGS="-O3 -I%p/include" LIB_DIR=lib dar

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 26 Apr 2008, at 18:09, Jack Howarth wrote: >In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4 > package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my > current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm > into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw package > in fedora

Re: [Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Daniel Macks
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:09:45PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4 > package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my > current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm > into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw packa

[Fink-devel] mesa-libglw and openmotif4

2008-04-26 Thread Jack Howarth
In working up some test packaging for a new openmotif4 package (to provide openmotif 2.3.0), I discovered that my current mesa-libglw package is explicitly linking libXm into libGLw.dylib. By comparision, the mesa-libglw package in fedora 8 linux doesn't do this (allowing the same libglw to be u