Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-16 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:55:57PM -0500, Koen van der Drift wrote: As discussed by Dan Macks and myself on the submission tracker (for gd-svg-pm), I suggested the following for handling perl modules. Maybe it has been discussed previously, and there might be very good reasons why it

Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-15 Thread Koen van der Drift
Hi, As discussed by Dan Macks and myself on the submission tracker (for gd-svg-pm), I suggested the following for handling perl modules. Maybe it has been discussed previously, and there might be very good reasons why it won't work. Feel free to trash it, but be nice :) Anyway, the idea is

[Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-12 Thread Koen van der Drift
Hi all, I submitted a package to the tracker that is pure perl (gd-svg-pm), but it depends on a versioned package (gd-pm). The package was not yet moved to unstable because of an apparent problem with the versioning. I quote the comments on the tracker (from Dan Macks): One could have

Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-12 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:18:37PM -0500, Koen van der Drift wrote: Hi all, I submitted a package to the tracker that is pure perl (gd-svg-pm), but it depends on a versioned package (gd-pm). The package was not yet moved to unstable because of an apparent problem with the versioning. I

Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-12 Thread David R. Morrison
Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] A possible solution would be to declare that any package that depends on a versioned module must be versioned. Period. It would therefore be installed in the versioned part of lib/perl5 and would have its dependencies on versioned packages. No

Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-12 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:39:20PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A possible solution would be to declare that any package that depends on a versioned module must be versioned. Period. It would therefore be installed in the versioned part of

Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-12 Thread David R. Morrison
Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:39:20PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: [snip] This would work pretty well, I think. However, there is another aspect to the problem. Some pm packages install binaries in /sw/bin and/or man pages in /sw/share/man. If you

Re: [Fink-devel] mixing pure and versioned perl modules

2004-01-12 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:12:47PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:39:20PM -0500, David R. Morrison wrote: Some pm packages install binaries in /sw/bin and/or man pages in /sw/share/man. If you have different pmXXX