Re: [Fink-devel] mtune and intel

2006-02-06 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 2/6/06, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex, >The changes I have to sparky-py (a 3.111-1002 version) are simply > to allow it to build in the 10.4 tree. These include... > > 1) the GCC variable was changed from 3.3 to 4.0 > 2) I eliminated the changes to the 'CXX= g+

Re: [Fink-devel] mtune and intel

2006-02-06 Thread Jack Howarth
Alex, The changes I have to sparky-py (a 3.111-1002 version) are simply to allow it to build in the 10.4 tree. These include... 1) the GCC variable was changed from 3.3 to 4.0 2) I eliminated the changes to the 'CXX= g++' section of the patch to c++/Makefile since the GCC

Re: [Fink-devel] mtune and intel

2006-02-06 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
On 2/6/06, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While adjusting my sparky-py packaging to build under the new 10.4 tree > last night, I noticed I had optimized the compile with a '-mtune=970'. What > is the recommended approach for handling this under 10.4 with the new > Architecture list.

[Fink-devel] mtune and intel

2006-02-06 Thread Jack Howarth
While adjusting my sparky-py packaging to build under the new 10.4 tree last night, I noticed I had optimized the compile with a '-mtune=970'. What is the recommended approach for handling this under 10.4 with the new Architecture list. It would be nice if the Architecture list could be used to