Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: [] Is this the correct course of action? I was under the impression that the 10.4-transitional tree was supposed to use gcc-3.3. No, by default (i.e. if the package itself doesn't do anything special), the 10.4-transitional tree uses g++-3.3 for C++ code and gcc-4.0 for C

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Koen van der Drift
Jack, Just to be sure, I want to build the package first (on 10.3). However, I cannot d/l the source code, both mirrors are not responsive. I will try again later. - Koen. On May 24, 2005, at 7:25 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Koen, As requested by Daniel, I have reverted the molmol 2k.2.

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Jack Howarth
Koen, Well in the case of glut and freeglut, I have verified that the builds aren't leaky. The glut build never looks in /sw/lib or /sw/include for headers or libraries. The freeglut build is safe with glut installed since it uses the freeglut basename for its headers and libraries and thus will

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Jack Howarth
Koen, As requested by Daniel, I have reverted the molmol 2k.2.0-19 package to build with gcc-3.3 once again rather than gcc-4.0. This version will be okay for both 10.3 and 10.4-transitional unstable. It is uploaded into the tracker... http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Daniel Macks
On May 24, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > I have uploaded a new molmol.info file (2k.2.0-19) for the unstable > branch of 10.4-transitional. This version builds against gcc-4.0 [...] Is this the correct course of action? I was under the impression that the 10.4-transitional tree was su

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Koen van der Drift
On May 24, 2005, at 11:09 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: I have uploaded a new molmol.info file (2k.2.0-19) for the unstable branch of 10.4-transitional. This version builds against gcc-4.0 and freeglut. It passes fink validate both as the info file and the resulting debs. I don't have Tiger, so can

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Koen van der Drift
On May 23, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: The goal is clean build first and foremost; *then* worry about avoiding buildlock deadlock. If there's leakage from an installed pkg into the build, please do specify the BuildConflicts...that's why we created the field no? If both packages s

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-24 Thread Jack Howarth
Koen, Thanks for getting the modified freeglut and glut packages in 10.3 and 10.4-transitional unstable. I have one last request. I have uploaded a new molmol.info file (2k.2.0-19) for the unstable branch of 10.4-transitional. This version builds against gcc-4.0 and freeglut. It passes fink val

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:25:54PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Koen, >While you are adding pymol-py, please update the glut and freeglut > packages in the 10.3 and 10.4-transitional unstable trees as well. > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1207413&group_id=17203&ati

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Koen van der Drift
On May 23, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: While you are adding pymol-py, please update the glut and freeglut packages in the 10.3 and 10.4-transitional unstable trees as well. Ok done. I assume they build and validate fine, I did not check that. - Koen. --

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Koen van der Drift
Done. Thanks for submitting the new pymol. - Koen. On May 23, 2005, at 10:18 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: Koen, The pymol-py package should go in both the 10.3 and 10.4-transitional trees (unstable). Thanks in advance. Jack --- Th

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Jack Howarth
Koen, While you are adding pymol-py, please update the glut and freeglut packages in the 10.3 and 10.4-transitional unstable trees as well. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1207413&group_id=17203&atid=414256 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=120741

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Jack Howarth
Koen, The pymol-py package should go in both the 10.3 and 10.4-transitional trees (unstable). Thanks in advance. Jack --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? En

Re: [Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Koen van der Drift
Which tree should they go into? I tested them on 10.3 and it works fine. If I know which trees and if there are no other objections I will commit them. Is the glut/freeglut issue that was discussed a bit ago solved? - Koen. On May 23, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: I have resubm

[Fink-devel] new pymol-py package

2005-05-23 Thread Jack Howarth
I have resubmitted the pymol-py package as new package on the tracker since I was having no luck whatsoever in getting this into unstable. Once again, this pymol-py package replaces the current pymol package and allows builds against python2.2, python2.3 or python2.4 with the resulting pymol-py