Yes, i saw that... However a "non smooth" update is fine as long as
there is a legible error message.. "node for foo already exists" is a
bug. :)
-Ben
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, at 05:51 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Yes, there was a problem with xforms-1.0 and lyx, so Jeff has put a
lo
Yes, there was a problem with xforms-1.0 and lyx, so Jeff has put a lower
version of xforms back in the tree and made lyx depend on this lower
version. I'm not sure what we can do to make the upgrade smooth, though.
-- Dave
Ben Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something about the lyx + xfor
Something about the lyx + xforms update causes it. I have perhaps a
strange combo of packages to update:
~ 155 % fink list lyx xforms
Information about 1819 packages read in 1 seconds.
(i) lyx1.2.1-2Wordprocessor utilizing LaTeX
i xforms 1.0-2 GU
