Re: [Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

2004-01-08 Thread Koen van der Drift
On Jan 8, 2004, at 2:24 PM, William Scott wrote: Even very good writers benefit from a proof-reader. It is much easier to catch other people's mistakes than it is to catch your own. There are many others here who simply are much more competent with this stuff than I am. I am an experimental s

Re: [Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

2004-01-08 Thread William Scott
On Jan 7, 2004, at 11:39 PM, D. Höhn wrote: you should simply ask for a CVS account. I think this is in the pipeline currently, but I plan to use this only with caution (see below). I am sure you are more than capable of taking care of your packages. ... since you have maitained packages for a

Re: [Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

2004-01-08 Thread "D. Höhn"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Here's a heretical thought: | | I've never been 100 % convinced that most of the stuff I have submitted | even belongs in fink. | | Much of it is rather specialized, like programs for X-ray | crystallography and other ty

[Fink-devel] non-core package submissions

2004-01-08 Thread wgscott
Here's a heretical thought: I've never been 100 % convinced that most of the stuff I have submitted even belongs in fink. Much of it is rather specialized, like programs for X-ray crystallography and other types of biophysics techniques. These programs have a very specialized user community, and