On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:29 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
It works pretty well for emacs, What do you think?
Although I quite like this idea, what about compiled C python modules,
the binaries are not compatible across python versions?
Peter
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:29 PM, Rohan Lloyd wrote:
It works pretty well for emacs, What do you think?
Although I quite like this idea, what about compiled C python modules,
the binaries are not compatible across python versions?
Peter:
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
So, I'll create numeric-py22 and pil-py22
packages ASAP and put them in experimental/jswhit.
If you were here, I'd kiss you :-)
Thanks, if you do not wish to maintain those packages, put my name on
them.
Peter
On Friday, Apr 4, 2003, at 00:08 Australia/Sydney, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
So, I'll create numeric-py22 and pil-py22
packages ASAP and put them in experimental/jswhit.
If you were here, I'd kiss you :-)
Thanks, if you do not wish to
Hi,
Depending upon which version of python is installed, the modules will
go into a different place (/sw/lib/python-VERSION/site-packages).
Now, this is a problem for me, and I think I will have to make
numeric-py22 and pil-py22 packages in order for sketch to work without
having to answer a
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Hi,
Depending upon which version of python is installed, the modules will
go into a different place (/sw/lib/python-VERSION/site-packages).
Peter: Yes - this is true.
Now, this is a problem for me, and I think I will have to make
numeric-py22
On Wednesday, Apr 2, 2003, at 23:57 Australia/Sydney, Peter O'Gorman
wrote:
Hi,
Depending upon which version of python is installed, the modules will
go into a different place (/sw/lib/python-VERSION/site-packages).
Now, this is a problem for me, and I think I will have to make
numeric-py22
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 03:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I sure hope not. I don't have the time to maintain all those variants.
Yes, I know it is a pain, but I don't see a way around it, at least the
current version of sketch has no hope of working with python-2.3 due to
changes made
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 03:56 PM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 03:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I sure hope not. I don't have the time to maintain all those
variants.
Yes, I know it is a pain, but I don't see a way around it, at least
the current version of
The problem with perl is similar, but not identical.
Many perl modules work just fine with all versions of perl, and those
don't necessarily need to be segregated from each other.
Once I get the bindist out the door, I plan to work on getting multiple
versions of perl coexisting with fink. For
On Wednesday, Apr 2, 2003, at 20:50 US/Eastern, David R. Morrison wrote:
The problem with perl is similar, but not identical.
Many perl modules work just fine with all versions of perl, and those
don't necessarily need to be segregated from each other.
Once I get the bindist out the door, I plan
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 11:50 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The problem with perl is similar, but not identical.
Many perl modules work just fine with all versions of perl, and those
don't necessarily need to be segregated from each other.
Once I get the bindist out the door, I plan to
12 matches
Mail list logo
