[Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread David R. Morrison
Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method for all users. (Anonymous CVS at sourceforge has become unresponsive AGAIN...) Thanks, Dave

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
I tried out selfupdate-rsync and it worked fine. However, I switched back to authenticated CVS because I wanted a package that wasn't yet available on the opendarwin mirror--anonymous CVS users probably wouldn't see a major change. I guess modifying the documentation would be in order, once

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Michèle Garoche
Le jeudi, 9 oct 2003, à 15:11 Europe/Paris, David R. Morrison a écrit : Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method for all users. (Anonymous CVS at sourceforge has become

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread mlist-fink
* David R. Morrison wrote (Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:11:46AM -0400): Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable Built it from source (using bootstrap.sh) and begun a fresh installation of the fink system. Been using the rsync method. No problems. -- jeremy avnet

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Kaben Nanlohy
Works. Side effects of prebinding queue caught me by surprise, but it's pretty neat. On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, David R. Morrison wrote: Does anybody have any feedback on fink 0.14.0? I'd like to move it to stable soon, so that we can announce the rsync update method as the preferred method for

Re: [Fink-devel] reports on 0.14.0 ?

2003-10-09 Thread Benjamin Reed
Kaben Nanlohy wrote: Works. Side effects of prebinding queue caught me by surprise, but it's pretty neat. Are you on 10.2? Or 10.2-gcc3.3? If the former, then something's wrong, you shouldn't get prebinding stuff unless you're on the gcc3.3 branch (which is the 0.14.1 beta). -- Benjamin