Re: [Fink-devel] revised legal statement?

2003-01-16 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Donnerstag, Jänner 16, 2003, at 01:40 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote: Folks, dmalloc has proposed the following revised legal statement. He says that he got no feedback about it although I don't remember having seen it before.

Re: [Fink-devel] revised legal statement?

2003-01-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Just to give an example of something in the new legal statement which needs work: The statement says that downloads may be made for personal, non-commercial use only. Actually, the Fink code itself is covered under the GPL, which has NO clause about non-commercial use. All but a very tiny

Re: [Fink-devel] revised legal statement?

2003-01-16 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Donnerstag, Jänner 16, 2003, at 02:27 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote: Just to give an example of something in the new legal statement which needs work: The statement says that downloads may be made for personal, non-commercial use

Re: [Fink-devel] revised legal statement?

2003-01-16 Thread David R. Morrison
Yes, but the software we are creating is released under the GPL, and your legal statement contradicts the GPL. Fink itself is GPL'd. -- Dave --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com Understand how to protect your customers personal

Re: [Fink-devel] revised legal statement?

2003-01-16 Thread David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Donnerstag, Jänner 16, 2003, at 02:58 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote: Yes, but the software we are creating is released under the GPL, and your legal statement contradicts the GPL. Fink itself is GPL'd. I'll adjust that then.