Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A little problem with the new geomview: It didn't upgrade gracefully.
> /sw/bin/geomview used to be a directory, and it remained so after the
> upgrade. It should now be a symlink to the geomview executable script,
> so there was no geomview executable
Sounds all good and fine. From my POV, feel free to check in your
modified packages (I assume you tested them, so I trust in you :)
Jeffrey could once more revise xfree86 I guess =)
The last remaining concern would be other packages which could have
problems caused by this too, even though the
> Incidentally this also gets rid of the 3000 multiply-defined symbols
I noticed that too, but I didn't count them :-)
-- Dave
___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
"David R. Morrison" wrote:
>
> I've found a better solution to our LessTif problems. There is no need
> to compile xfree86 with -flat_namespace, so long as every package which
> depends on LessTif is compiled with a new LDFLAG, -force_flat_namespace .
Yes, this looks like the best solution so f
I've found a better solution to our LessTif problems. There is no need
to compile xfree86 with -flat_namespace, so long as every package which
depends on LessTif is compiled with a new LDFLAG, -force_flat_namespace .
I've checked this with five packages: ddd, geomview, mgv, nedit, xephem.
(I hav
