With your latest gnuplot, I got:
...
Enable generation of PDF files
...
So it *seems* PDF support is built properly now. Also the bogus
pdflib.dylib symlink is not present.
Cheers,
Max
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Ded
On Apr 2,2003 00:38:09 +0200, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>David R. Morrison wrote:
>> Hello. Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following
>> packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace. The new versions are all in the
>> unstable tree. It would be particularly useful t
David R. Morrison wrote:
Hello. Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following
packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace. The new versions are all in the
unstable tree. It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py,
octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of gnuplo
Hello. Please help me quickly test some new versions of the following
packages: pdflib, gnuplot, grace. The new versions are all in the
unstable tree. It would be particularly useful to know that gnuplot-py,
octave, and siag work correctly with the new version of gnuplot.
The change which was
OK, sorry about the sloppy specification of my software versions.
OS 10.2.2 plus July + August dev tools and the Oct patch. I am well aware
of the August-only install problem, but it is not the case here. I'm
compiling other software all the time and it has all been working well.
For that matte
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 08:06 AM, Scott W Mitchell wrote:
Latest OS X and dev tools, G4-400 with 512MB RAM, everything else
working
fine.
Define "latest dev tools". Such problems are usually caused by the user
installing the August tool update (small update app) on top of the 10.
I wrote :
> Good time to try and do an update-all I'm waiting after for a couple of
> weeks...
OK, my big compile lasted all night (things like expat an xfree :-) and
all went OK
I didn't see any bug so far.
--
Xavier
http://www.freetibet.org
http://www.tibet.fr/
--
OK, after seeing others' posts, I ignored the checksum error and
proceeded, but on the first time around I got a seg fault while
building apt. On a second try, it compiled fine. So I think it
was a random glitch but am posting these results anyways in case they
mean more to someone else...
Late
I wrote :
> Definitely a checksum problem...
Yeah ! You fixed it really quickly, thanks !
I'm now compiling fink + apt-pkg, it's OK.
Good time to try and do an update-all I'm waiting after for a couple of
weeks...
--
Xavier
http://www.freetibet.org
http://www.tibet.fr/
-
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 12:33 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
I was able to download fink-0.11.1-1, but the checksum showed up as
wrong. I went ahead and did the install anyway, and it appeared to
build .
I'll fix the MD5 once the server starts working again. (ssh auth
problems today)
David R. Morrison wrote :
> Hi all. I've just released fink-0.11.1-1 (to both 10.1 and 10.2) and
> apt-0.5.4-7 (to 10.2 only).
>
> I need testing reports on these ASAP so that I can move them to stable,
> so that I can release the bindist.
Hold on, I'm just doeing a selfudpadte-cvs
[...cvs...]
I forgot to add that apt-0.5.4-7 seemed to build fine.
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 14:51, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Hi all. I've just released fink-0.11.1-1 (to both 10.1 and 10.2) and
> apt-0.5.4-7 (to 10.2 only).
>
> I need testing reports on these ASAP so that I can move them to stable,
> so that
I was able to download fink-0.11.1-1, but the checksum showed up as
wrong. I went ahead and did the install anyway, and it appeared to
build .
One question about the apt-0.5.4-7 build: the configuration reports
that my dual-processor machine has one cpu:
...
checking number of cpus... 1
...
The checksum was incorrect.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:51:44 -0500
> From: David R. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Fink-devel] testing needed
>
> Hi all. I've just released fink-0.11.1-
it'll take awhile for the sf mirrors to pick it up...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I wasn't able to download the fink-0.11.1-1 source.
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett
-=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc.
-=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net em
I wasn't able to download the fink-0.11.1-1 source.
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 14:51, David R. Morrison wrote:
> Hi all. I've just released fink-0.11.1-1 (to both 10.1 and 10.2) and
> apt-0.5.4-7 (to 10.2 only).
>
> I need testing reports on these ASAP so that I can move them to stable,
> so that I c
Hi all. I've just released fink-0.11.1-1 (to both 10.1 and 10.2) and
apt-0.5.4-7 (to 10.2 only).
I need testing reports on these ASAP so that I can move them to stable,
so that I can release the bindist.
Thanks,
Dave
---
This sf.net email
17 matches
Mail list logo
