Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On 07/07/2008, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > The current wine package in fink requires ghostscript to build. > However, it excludes ghostscript-esp from the allowed ghostscript > variants. Imagemagick requires this ghostscript variant to run so this > causes problems. >

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

Hello The current wine package in fink requires ghostscript to build. However, it excludes ghostscript-esp from the allowed ghostscript variants. Imagemagick requires this ghostscript variant to run so this causes problems. Thanks Michal

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

I went ahead and did that. The package got added, so the status was changed to "closed". The group was set to "added to Fink", and the resolution was set to "accepted" On Wednesday 02 July 2008 12:31:29 Damian Dimmich wrote: > Hi, > > What should the status be? I should be able to change it's

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

Hi, What should the status be? I should be able to change it's status since I made it. Thanks for all the effort! Cheers, Damian Kevin Horton wrote: > On 2-Jul-08, at 11:25 , Alexander Hansen wrote: > > >> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 11:16:51 Kevin Horton wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 02,

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On 2-Jul-08, at 11:25 , Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Wednesday 02 July 2008 11:16:51 Kevin Horton wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:30:10AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: >>> Kevin Horton wrote: It isn't at all obvious how I would commit this package to the unstable tree. Do I not hav

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 11:16:51 Kevin Horton wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:30:10AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > > Kevin Horton wrote: > >> It isn't at all obvious how I would commit this package to the > >> unstable tree. Do I not have commit privileges from the tracker, or > >> do I s

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:30:10AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > >> >> It isn't at all obvious how I would commit this package to the >> unstable tree. Do I not have commit privileges from the tracker, or >> do I simply need to puzzle out how it works? My SF ID is "r

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On Wednesday 02 July 2008 05:30:10 Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > > It isn't at all obvious how I would commit this package to the > > unstable tree. Do I not have commit privileges from the tracker, or > > do I simply need to puzzle out how it works? My SF ID is "rv8". > > There

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

Kevin Horton wrote: > > It isn't at all obvious how I would commit this package to the > unstable tree. Do I not have commit privileges from the tracker, or > do I simply need to puzzle out how it works? My SF ID is "rv8". There is no direct way to commit from the tracker, if this was your

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On 1-Jul-08, at 18:38 , Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > [] >> It builds OK for me on 10.5.3 in maintainer mode with --build-as- >> nobody. It runs as well >> as any previous versions I have tried. This appears to be ready to >> be committed, but I'm no expert. > > The latter

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

Kevin Horton wrote: [] > It builds OK for me on 10.5.3 in maintainer mode with --build-as- > nobody. It runs as well > as any previous versions I have tried. This appears to be ready to be > committed, but I'm no expert. The latter has never stopped me from committing in the past :-) (Not en

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On 1-Jul-08, at 16:22 , Alexander Hansen wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:53:16 Damian Dimmich wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> The last three wine package submissions have been sitting on the >> tracker >> without going into the tree - >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=19982

Re: [Fink-devel] wine package

On Tuesday 01 July 2008 15:53:16 Damian Dimmich wrote: > Hi All, > > The last three wine package submissions have been sitting on the tracker > without going into the tree - > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1998212&group_id=1 >7203&atid=414256 > > Anyone want to try it out

[Fink-devel] wine package

Hi All, The last three wine package submissions have been sitting on the tracker without going into the tree - http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1998212&group_id=17203&atid=414256 Anyone want to try it out? Also, I've put myself forward as the new maintainer (I hope that

Re: [Fink-devel] Wine package on the tracker

On 12 Apr 2008, at 05:21, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Since I'm apparently not going to be in the market for an Intel Mac > until the US housing market turns back around, can somebody who can > actually build wine please look at > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? > func=detail&aid=192483

[Fink-devel] Wine package on the tracker

Since I'm apparently not going to be in the market for an Intel Mac until the US housing market turns back around, can somebody who can actually build wine please look at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1924834&group_id=17203&atid=414256 ? Thanks. --

Re: [Fink-devel] Wine package

On Sep 22, 2006, at 12:49 PM, Jim White wrote: Excellent! I've been planning to try building Wine myself and was thinking that Fink would be the best way to go. I will probably start with CodeWeavers version and let you kno

Re: [Fink-devel] Wine package

Trevor Harmon wrote: > ... > So, I created a "first draft" of a Wine package and posted it here: > > http://vocaro.com/trevor/files/wine.info Excellent! I've been planning to try building Wine myself and was thinking that Fink would be the best way to go. I will probab

[Fink-devel] Wine package

I recently bought a MacBook Pro and happen to have a couple Windows programs I need to run. I figured I'd simply install Wine through Fink, but it seems no Wine package has ever been written. Surprising, given that Wine compiles and runs just fine on 10.4 with an Intel chip. So, I created a