> On Jan 30, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Alexander Hansen
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 08:31, David Lowe wrote:
>>
>> So i was looking into updating the currently unmaintained Audacious
>> package. We have version 2.2, upstream has 3.7. Since our package names
>> actually start with "a
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 08:31, David Lowe wrote:
>
> So i was looking into updating the currently unmaintained Audacious
> package. We have version 2.2, upstream has 3.7. Since our package names
> actually start with "audacious2", would it be better to make the new package
> set as auda
